My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-11-07_REVISION - C1981041 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981041
>
2022-11-07_REVISION - C1981041 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2022 1:11:41 PM
Creation date
11/7/2022 12:28:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/7/2022
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
Type & Sequence
RN8
Email Name
CCW
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
light use roads 3 and 5 and portions of light use road 4 and haul road 3 was eliminated. <br /> SCC also fully reclaimed the sediment ponds UTL 1 and 2. To remove the ponds <br /> SCC made the appropriate demonstration required by 4.05.2(2). <br /> SCC found a good photo of the irrigated lands at the loadout before any of it was <br /> disturbed by mining. The 1976 photo was scanned and inserted into ACAD to <br /> determine the extent of the irrigated land to address alluvial valley floor considerations <br /> (see Figures 33-1 and 33-2 of the permit application package). A total of 26.1 acres <br /> were being farmed in 1976. The water right at the loadout is limited to the irrigation <br /> of 14 acres. SCC determined that 13.9 acres of the irrigable land were inside the loop <br /> and 12.2 acres were outside the rail loop. SCC concluded it would be possible to <br /> restore the capability of flood irrigation to the land outside the loop. The original <br /> reclamation plan was to restore the capability to flood irrigate the land. Upon approval <br /> of the land use change under PR-4,the reclamation plan would be similar. SCC would <br /> be able to flood irrigate 87% of the acreage for which irrigation water is available. <br /> Under the plan as amended by Permit Revision No. 4, the majority of the disturbed <br /> lands in the permit area will be reclaimed to support a "Fish and Wildlife Habitat" <br /> postmining land use (see Exhibit 63). With approval of the revision application(PR- <br /> 4), the Unit Train Loadout and portion of the railroad spur and overland conveyor <br /> corridor, north of I 9/10 Road, were converted from "Fish and Wildlife Habitat" to <br /> "Industrial or Commercial". The land use change allowed for long term post-mine <br /> use of the loadout area and various associated facilities for rail loading, unloading, <br /> and storage of construction materials. Halliburton currently uses the loadout and a <br /> portion of the railroad spur and overland conveyor as an industrial site. SCC entered <br /> into an agreement with Halliburton to allow them to begin using the loadout facility <br /> for unloading freight cars, storage and shipping of construction materials during the <br /> first quarter of 2006. In January 2006 the Division approved TR-48 to incorporate <br /> into the permit application package the necessary approvals for the unloading,storage, <br /> or loading directly onto trucks specified materials within the unit train loadout and <br /> along Haul Road 93. Halliburton continues to use the loadout facility for these <br /> purposes. <br /> Prior to the sale of the loadout facility to Halliburton, Snowcap Coal Company was <br /> the legal owner of the surface for all lands within the Unit Train Loadout and portions <br /> of the Railroad Spur and Overland Conveyor, for which the proposed post-mine land <br /> use change was requested. In accordance with 2.05.5(2)(b), a Surface Landowner <br /> Consent was signed on May 9, 2007 by Nelson L. Kidder Vice-President of Snowcap <br /> Coal Company and was submitted for inclusion into the permit application package. <br /> SCC contacted the Mesa County Department of Planning and Economic Development <br /> to obtain their comments on the plan proposed with PR-4. Mesa County Department <br /> of Planning and Economic Development which is the local government agency that <br /> would have to approve the use of the land following reclamation. Subsequently, <br /> Halliburton submitted an application for a Mesa County Conditional Use Permit. In <br /> December 2008,Mesa County approved a Conditional Use Permit for the Halliburton <br /> — Cameo Sand Storage Facility. <br /> 53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.