Laserfiche WebLink
113 <br /> i evidence. 1 Where in this document does it say that <br /> 2 MR. SCHULTZ: Please provide the witness 2 Mr. Fontanari has to irrigate his land? <br /> 3 with the document. 1 3 A. It does not. <br /> 4 MR. BECKWITH: If I may, do you have a 4 Q. Where does it say in this docLmnt that <br /> 5 copy? 5 he has to grow crops on his land? <br /> 6 MR. JUSTUS: No. 6 MR. SINGLETARY: It's irrelevant. It's <br /> 7 MR. BECKWITH: Of the actual exhibit? 7 irrelevant. <br /> 8 MS. VAN NOORD: They're on their 8 MR. BECKOH: Understood. Let me ask <br /> 9 carputers. 9 it a different way, then, Mr. Chairman. <br /> 10 MR. BECIWTH: I'm sorry. Just a 10 Q. (BY MR. BECKWITH) Your testimony about <br /> 11 minute. See if I've got one here. 11 the reclamation, how does it relate to the adequacy of <br /> 12 MR. BECMITH: John, this is my copy. 12 the testing conducted by Fugro? <br /> 13 MR. JUSTUS: I have a copy of it. 13 A. Which reclamation are you talking about? <br /> 14 MR. SCHULTZ: So I'd just like the 14 I mean, there's two levels of reclamation. <br /> 15 record to reflect that Mr. Beckwith is showing 15 Q. You've already testified in your -- in <br /> 16 Mr. Stark -- 16 your document up here on the board about your <br /> 17 MR. BECKWITH: I haven't shown it to 17 reclamation. Reseeding and all these others, how does <br /> 18 him. 18 that relate to the -- and how does it establish the <br /> 19 MR. SCHULTZ: -- MR-82 -- one page of 19 adequacy or inadequacy of Fugro's testing? <br /> 20 MR-82, page 14-30-II. i20 A. The reseeding is mutually exclusive of <br /> 21 Q. (BY MR. BECWITH) Are you familiar with 21 Fugro's testing. <br /> 22 the language of this ant, Mr. Stark? 22 Q. In other words, it does not, does it? <br /> 23 A. Excuse me. I am. 23 How they reseed and what they reseed with does not <br /> 24 Q. And what did-- in terms of the 24 relate in any manner to whether or not Fugro adequately <br /> 25 hydrologic connection -- excuse me. In terms of MR-82, 25 or inadequately tested this property to determine the <br /> 286 288 <br /> 1 did Snowcap agree to inspect, report, repair, submit 1 presence of hydrologic connection; is that correct? <br /> 2 estimates of repair and time relative to hydrologic 2 MR. SCHULTZ: I'm going to object. This <br /> 3 connections on lands owned by Fontanari? 3 is -- go ahead. <br /> 4 MR. SCHULTZ: I'm going to object to 4 A. It doesn't, but any surface disturbance <br /> 5 this question. He's asking for a conclusion of a 5 per the act and the rules must be reclaimed. That <br /> 6 document that is -- I'm not sure how many pages, but 6 surface disturbance did not — <br /> 7 it's many pages. So if you could narrow your 7 Q. I'm riot disputing that. <br /> 8 question. 8 A. Surface disturbance has nothing to do <br /> 9 MR. BECMTH: It's already in evidence. 9 with testing procedures. So I would agree with that. <br /> to Certainly. 10 MR. BECKUM: Nothing further. <br /> 11 Q. (BY MR. BECWITH) Does it -- let me put 11 MR. SINGLETARY: Let me -- I guess I'm <br /> 12 it a different way. Snowcap commits to conducting an 12 troubled here. I -- could you explain to me, what <br /> 13 investigation -- you already have this in evidence -- 13 different (sic) did you do in this particular case -- I <br /> 14 to determine the extent of the hydrologic camizdcation 14 call it "case"; it's not -- your -- your observation <br /> 15 existing between the underground workings -- 115 and your -- your due diligence and finding a solution <br /> 16 MR. JUSTUS: Objection. Are you 16 for a problem that you do daily as part of your job. <br /> 17 testifying, Mr. Beckwith? 17 I mean, you follow the statutes. You've <br /> 18 MR. BECWTH: No. I am reading from an 18 done whatever. I'm just confused about -- did you go <br /> 19 exhibit. 19 outside of those guidelines? I don't know. I mean, it <br /> 20 MR. SINGLETARY: Go ahead. 20 sounds to me like, I mean, from what I've seen so far <br /> 21 Q. (BY MR. BECIWITH) -- and the properties 21 that, you know, we do as staff and we do as an agency <br /> 22 overlying -- of the underground workings of the 22 what we normally do, and that's protect -- you know, <br /> 23 Roadside Mine, also known as the South Portal Mine, on 23 it's protect what we're trying to do in Colorado. Is <br /> 24 the properties overlying these workings that belong to 24 there something -- am I missing something here? <br /> 25 Mr. Rudolph Fontanari and Mr. Jason Carey. 25 MR. STARK: No. You're correct, sir. <br /> 287 289 <br />