2017-05-25_REVISION - C1981041 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

81 1 A. Neither of them have a gauge. 1 MR. BECKWITH: If I my. I'll move over 2 Q. And, in fact, this trench that we're all i 2 so I can observe. 3 talking about -- that sane of the water goes to the 3 Mr. Carey -- 4 trench; sane of it goes to the pond -- that trench no 4 Can I stand? 5 longer exists; is that correct? 5 MR. SINGLETARY: Sure. 6 A. I don't know. The last time I saw it it 6 EXAMINATION 7 existed. 7 BY MR. BECMITH: 8 Q. Mien Is the last time you were out at the 8 Q. Mr. Carey, you have been asked questions 9 site? 9 about the adequacy of the ERT testing conducted by 10 A. Let's see. I don't know the date 10 Rigro, and we have testimony that was conducted in 11 exactly. I think it was early -- it was late April 11 April and August of 2016? 12 this year. April 2017. 12 A. That's -- 13 Q. Another follow-up question. So in late I13 Q. You have to answer yes or no. 14 April that trench still existed when you visited the 14 A. Yes. 15 site? 15 Q. Is -- you have reviewed -- excuse me. 16 A. The last time I visited the site the 16 Have you reviewed the reports of Fugro from their 17 trench existed. 17 testing in April and August of 2016? 18 MR. SCHULTZ: Okay. No further 18 MR. SCHULTZ: I'm going to object to 19 questions. 19 this question as Mr. Carey, given the information we 20 MS. IHTERBACR-NORMANN: Is this the j2o did receive regarding experts, there's nothing in his 21 trench that is on Photo 4, Photo 5 of Exhibit C? 121 endorsement that talks about ERT testing. 22 Either one of those. 22 MR. SINGLETARY: Sustained. 23 MR. CAREY: Correct. I believe -- I 23 Q. (BY MR. BECEWITH) Let me ask it a 24 believe the trench we're all talking about, for 24 different way. Should there have been a different 25 clarification, is just to the east of the Carey Pond 25 method of wetting the soil in order to conduct the ERT 254 256 1 here, and this is the approximate layout of it in blue. 1 testing? 2 And I would-- from my observations of 2 MR. SCHULTZ: I continue my objection. 3 the site, I agree that I think Exhibit C-4 and Exhibit 3 MR. SINGLETARY: Sustained. 4 C-5 show that trench -- is what I observed. 4 MR. BECRWITH: Thank you. Nothing 5 EXAMINATION 5 further. 6 BY MR. JUSTUS: 6 MR. JUSTUS: We'd like to break to 7 Q. Mr. Carey, I have a follow-up question. 7 consider rebuttal testimony at this point, particularly 8 On this breakdown of 75/25, when the pond has been 8 given the late nature of what has been provided in 9 full -- filled and the elevation is raised to the point 9 testimony by Mr. Carey. We may bring Mr. Hild back to 10 it is backing up, would the breakdown of 75/25 be 10 testify. 11 appropriate if the infiltration rate limits the 11 MR. SINGLETARY: What's our time, John? 12 capacity of the pond? 12 MR. ROBERTS: Absolutely. So referring 13 A. No. I think the pond infiltrates faster 13 to the prehearing order, we are at objectors' 14 the higher the water in the pond is. 14 presentation, which is E. Of the two and a half hours 15 Q. So are you suggesting it would 15 that are allocated there, there is one hour and 18 16 infiltrate at 6 acre feet a day? 16 minutes left for that. 17 A. I don't know what that rate is. As I -- 17 Do the objectors anticipate more 18 as I stated earlier, we de not have measuremnts on 18 witnesses, or are we closing up here? 19 that. 19 MR. BEClgtM: We are not calling any 20 Q. You don't have any information on 20 for Fontanari. 21 that? 21 MR. ROBERTS: Mr. Stutz, are you calling 22 A. You asked me that earlier, and I 22 any more? 23 answered that question. 23 MR. STUTZ: I don't anticipate anything, 24 Q. Thank you. 24 but it depends on what happens with the -- 25 MR. STUTZ: We have a back bench. 25 MR. ROBERTS: You still have the 255 257