Laserfiche WebLink
CIVII RFS-VURCFS, LLI <br /> ENGINEERS 6 PLANNERS <br /> October 14,2022 <br /> Mr. Peter Hays <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br /> Denver, Colorado 80203 <br /> RE: Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C.,Section 20 Mine, File No. M-2022.001, 112c Permit Application <br /> Groundwater Model Review; Response <br /> Dear Mr. Hays: <br /> This letter addresses the Adequacy Review letter dated September 12, 2022 regarding the Section 20 <br /> Gravel Mine 112 Construction Materials Reclamation Permit Application Package. Responses to your <br /> comments follow: <br /> 1. On the acknowledgement page the signature and seal are missing, please provide the missing <br /> information. Signature and Seal have been included. <br /> 2.The area is modelled as one slurry wall but there are going to be up to 8 individual walled cells. <br /> The Division is concerned that during construction of the individual cells, not just cell 5S,there <br /> could be mounding and shadowing effects that are overlooked or obscured by modelling the <br /> site as one cell, please comment. The site was modelled as individual cells from Cell 3 to Cell 6 to <br /> determine the phasing of the mitigation measures proposed in the August 2022 report. The tables <br /> and figures 8 through 10 from the individual model runs have been included in the modified Report. <br /> The Mining Plan report discusses the mounding resulting from the slung walls being interconnected <br /> resulting in full obstruction of groundwater flow which represents the"worst case scenario"for <br /> mounding and shadowing effects. <br /> 3.The Division is aware there is an approved slurry wall structure that will be located immediately <br /> to the west of this site, Monarch Mountain (M2022-009).The installation of this structure <br /> needs to be included into the model and the model re-run to determine how groundwater is <br /> affected by both slung walled structures. The inclusion of the Monarch DENM site in the model <br /> simulations results in CR recommending additional mitigation measures to include: 1)dewatering <br /> wells or an underdrain in the southeastern corner;and 2)an underdrain starting west of the Western <br /> Mutual Ditch and CR 44 intersection extending west finally daylighting into the South Platte River <br /> valley. The dewatering infrastructure(wells/underdrain)in the southeast will be designed to remove <br /> a minimum of 3.25 cfs and the underdrain to the west will remove at least 3.26 cfs. An underdrain is <br /> also needed on the Monarch DENM Site between Cell 3 and WCR 42 to offset this mine's <br /> contribution to the regional groundwater level impacts and this same alignment would be easily <br /> combined with the Section 20 discharge in a single outfall(Refer Figure 6). <br /> 4.The report states the shadowing effects to the north will be minimized by the unnamed slough <br /> and infiltration ponds. Please provide modelling that demonstrates this will be the case. <br /> Additionally, if the infiltration ponds were to go dry as a result of the shadowing the Applicant <br /> needs to provide a mitigation plan. Included in the mitigation plan for shadowing the Applicant <br /> needs to propose groundwater levels that will begin the mitigation efforts. Mitigation measures proposed <br /> to address the potentially negative impacts of constructing the subject slurry wall(s)include: <br /> 830E C❑LORADO BLVD • SUITE 200 • FIRESTONE, COLORADO B0504 • PHONE: 303.833.1 41 6 • FAX: <br /> 303.833.28SO <br />