Laserfiche WebLink
Subsidence Evaluation for the <br />Exhibit 60E Southern Panels, Apache Rocks West, & Sunset Trail Mining Areas Page 35 <br /> <br />831-032.923 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br />December 2021 <br />Sunset Trail mining areas are undermined. The clay-rich material that lines these ponds is expected <br />to provide a seal against subsidence effects. <br />Numerous observations have been made of the stock watering ponds and U.S. Forest Service water <br />resources over both B-seam and E-seam longwall mining. Based on years of field studies, none <br />of these resources has been noticeably affected when longwall mining occurred beneath them. <br />These observations are documented in the annual Subsidence and Geologic Field Observations <br />reports. <br />11.3 Streams and Ditches <br />The primary streams in the Southern Panels mining area are Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek, Deep <br />Creek, Poison Creek, and Lick Creek. A primary source of water to the Dry Fork and Minnesota <br />Reservoir comes from the Deep Creek Ditch, wherein the trans-basin water is conveyed through <br />the upper drainage of Deep Creek and transmitted to Dry Fork. The Deep Creek Ditch was <br />constructed in debris flows or colluvium and alluvium derived from the debris flow, as described <br />in Section 11.2, this debris flow material is not expected to be impacted by longwall mining. There <br />is an area of the Deep Creek Ditch that has a hard rock bottom. This area is limited to the lower <br />gradient areas above the first landslide in the Dry Fork mining area (Refer to Map 1). The Deep <br />Creek Ditch is not anticipated to be affected by longwall mining based on the eastern extent of E- <br />seam longwall panel E5 and the projected extent of longwall panel E6. <br />Longwall mining of the E-seam panels E1 to E5 has occurred under Dry Fork where the <br />overburden depth above the longwall panels drops as low as about 375 feet. No adverse impacts <br />were observed during or subsequent to the longwall panel mining. The proposed B-seam panels <br />B26 to B29 will have 200 to 300 feet of additional overburden, and do not extend as far west as <br />the E-seam panels where the overburden under the Dry Fork channel is at a minimum. In the <br />Apache Rocks West mining area, Horse Gulch enters Minnesota Reservoir from the north and has <br />already had longwall mining occur beneath it in B-seam longwall panels B12 to B13-A with no <br />apparent cracking in the alluvial material. Although E-seam mining had less overburden (down to <br />about 350 feet), the experience of mining beneath Dry Fork with similar overburden indicated that <br />there will not be adverse impacts to the Horse Gulch channel even though the alluvial thickness is <br />less than Dry Fork. <br />As discussed in Section 5.3.2, no cracks were observed in the alluvium and colluvium of Sylvester <br />Gulch, Deep Creek, and Dry Fork during periodic field observations. The near-surface alluvial <br />material consists of primarily sand, silt, clay, and soil that ranges in estimated thickness from 25 <br />to 75 feet. The alluvium and colluvium in Dry Fork and Lick Creek, which also has an estimated <br />thickness range of 25 to 75 feet, contains more clay than does the Deep Creek alluvium. Therefore, <br />it is even less likely that cracks will occur in colluvium and alluvium in the stream valleys of the <br />Southern Panels mining area despite the shallow overburden. <br />The Sunset Trail mining area includes South Prong and some of its tributaries. The channels all <br />have steep gradients and are not anticipated to be adversely affected by longwall mining of Panels <br />SS1 to SS4. Exhibit 55B addresses potential impacts to South Prong in more detail.