My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-09-29_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2022-09-29_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2022 2:39:13 PM
Creation date
10/6/2022 2:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/29/2022
Doc Name
pg 2.05-200 to 2.05-300
Section_Exhibit Name
2.05.6 Mitigation of Surface Coal Mining Operation Impacts Part 2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />fault zones that may be encountered while mining the E Seam in the SOD permit <br />revision area (see below). However, the known or inferred fault zones aze neazly vertical in <br />orientation and may be very difficult to identify from vertical borehole evaluation. <br />• Water quality analyses from various surface and subsurface sources have been reviewed to <br />assess similarities for purposes of "finger-printing" these fault inflows. <br />Isotope analyses on samples obtained in November 1996 from the fault inflows, after a <br />sustained period of constant 85± gpm inflow were also conducted for "finger-printing" <br />and age-dating (residence time) purposes. These analyses indicate this water has been <br />below the ground surface for an extended period of time. Tritium isotope analysis <br />shows there to be no tritium within the samples for all practical purposes. This <br />indicates that the water entered the subsurface prior to the detonation of nuclear <br />explosives in the atmosphere (i.e., before 1943). Carbon dating suggests that the fault <br />inflows are as much as 10,500 years old. <br />Oxygen and hydrogen isotope ratio analyses were also conducted on fault inflows. The <br />results show a deviation from the ratios expected for meteoric waters in the Rocky <br />Mountain region (i.e., the Meteoric Water Line). This deviation indicates a lack of <br />direct communication or direct recharge from a surface water source. Additional water <br />quality analyses have been conducted and compared with known water sources in the <br />general vicinity of the mine to assess the potential source of the fault water and the <br />potential impacts to the water resources of the area. These data indicate that the <br />groundwater within these two fault systems discharge from hydraulically isolated <br />systems even though the source has been determined to be a fractured groundwater <br />reservoir within the Rollins Sandstone beneath the B Seam coal. <br />Distribution systems within the mine have been and will be constructed to handle these large <br />inflows, and to separate and discharge the water to either the large capacity sumps or the surface. <br />MCC has constructed pipelines and necessary pump stations in the entries developed north of the <br />BEM Fault projection in the Box Canyon Mains. Water quality results indicate that the fault <br />system water, like other inflows to the mine, is of sufficient quality to allow for direct discharge <br />to the North Fork. Other pipelines carry sediment-laden water to the NW or NE Panels sealed <br />sumps or to surface ponds for treatment, if necessary, and release (or use). Evaluation of <br />downgradient migration of water stored in these sealed sumps has been considered <br />including evaluation of the sealed workings of the Sanborn Creek Mine (a B Seam mine on <br />the north side of the North Fork that is no longer active). The very low permeability of the <br />coal seams and surrounding formations suggest that very limited downgradient movement <br />of water from the sealed sump is likely. Projections of the BEM and 14HG fault systems <br />show that, if they were to extend across the North Fork, they would not intersect any of the <br />B Seam workings of that mine (i.e., projections are to the east of the mine workings). These <br />fault zones do, however, project into the F Seam workings of the Hawks Nest Mine (east of <br />the Sanborn Creek Mine) which neither encountered these faults zones nor experienced <br />any significant groundwater inflows. MCC believes that the water-bearing BEM and 14HG <br />. fault systems are unique to West Elk Mine and, as a result, do not extend any significant <br />distance away from the permit area. As a result, the proposed storage of water within the Box <br />1.05-253 Revised June 2005 PRIO; Rev. March 1006; Rev. May 1006 PRIG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.