Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mrne <br /> <br />Table 57 <br />TDS Concentrations and Loads Relative to 2001 CHIA Anal sis <br />Scenario Avg. Continuous <br />Discharge Rate <br />( pm) TDS <br />Concentration <br />(mg/L) Annual Salt <br />Loading <br />(tons/ ear) Percent of CHIA <br />Loading <br />1996 270 2 000 1 180 4% <br />2002 284 1,887 1,922 6% <br />"Worst Case° 500 3 000 3 290 11 <br />2001 CHIA 5,520 2,500 30,159 --- <br />Water Oualitv Implications oI Discharge to Lone Pine Gulch <br />MCC currently discharges mine water form the Sylvester Gulch mine dewatering facility. The <br />Lone Pine Gulch portals were sealed and reclaimed in 2002 and 2003. <br />Water Ouality Impacts oI Sylvester Gulch Pumping Plant Operational <br />As of August 2000, the risk to North Fork water quality posed by the mine decreased because: <br />The pumping facility in Sylvester Gulch became operational The maximum dischazge <br />capacity of this facility is 2,000 gpm. <br />2. Having removed the stored water in the sealed sumps, MCC has capacity to store neazly <br />800 acre-feet of water within the NW and NE Panels sealed sumps. <br />3. The sealed sumps provide effective treatment (i.e. reduction of TSS) of the mine water prior <br />to pumping out of the sumps. <br />North Fork Impacts Irom Sumped Groundwater Flows <br /> <br />As presented in the Groundwater Quantity Effects section of this permit, if the sumps aze <br />ultimately used by MCC to their full capacity, a maximum calculated "worst case" groundwater <br />outflow to the North Fork of approximately 0.7 to 8.4 gpm is calculated to occur (based on <br />available B Seam permeability data), but MCC's actual experiences defines this rate to be closer <br />to zero. Filtration, adsorption, absorption, and other factors will act on constituents in the water <br />as it moves downgradient. MCC's actual experience when drilling the in-mine horizontal drill <br />hole into the NW Panels sealed sump from entries developed from the northwest corner of the <br />11NE longwall panel, confirms that the mine water outflow from the sealed sumps will likely be <br />less than the calculated worst case outflow, as above. The total length of the drill hole (called <br />NW Sump #1 horizontal drill hole) was approximately 232 feet and no water was encountered <br />during drilling of this hole through the B Seam until the hole was only 17 feet from the sealed <br />sump -even with an estimated 65 feet of water head at this location for nearly a year. At a <br />seepage rate of only 0.7 to 8.4 gpm, North Fork water quality will not be measurably affected by <br />groundwater outflows from the sumps. <br />2.05-239 Revised Jwe 2005 PRIG; Rev. March 2006; Rev. May 2006 PRI G <br />