My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-09-29_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2022-09-29_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2022 2:48:41 PM
Creation date
10/6/2022 1:59:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/29/2022
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 10G Panels 15 -17
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONTAINS PRIVILEGED INFORMATION – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE <br /> <br /> 6 <br />valleys in the late 1890s. The region produced coal, precious minerals, marble, and timber. Cattle <br />ranching was important from the time of the earliest settlement; sheep ranching became established <br />later. Agriculture was prominent in the low -lying areas, particularly in the North Fork Valley, <br />which specialized in fruit production. Many of these industries remain prominent to this day, <br />particularly coal mining, logging, cattle ranching, and fruit growing. Exploration for liquid <br />hydrocarbons began with the extraction of oil in the 1920s and later expanded to natural gas, an <br />industry that has remained important into the twenty -first century. Other important revenue- <br />generating modern uses of the region’s natural environment include tourism, hunting, and other <br />forms of recreation. <br /> <br /> <br />PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND EXPECTED RESULTS <br />A literature review and records search was conducted prior to fieldwork to identify and <br />review previous cultural resources investigations and previously documented sites within 0.5 mi. of <br />the project’s APE. The identification of previous work and known sites helps develop field strategies <br />based upon expected site densities. Additionally, the file search assists in ensuring that all <br />previously documented archaeological sites within the project area are relocated , to assess the <br />potential impacts of the proposed undertaking, and to evaluate whether portions of the project area <br />have been adequately surveyed by previous projects. Alpine reviewed data obtained through a <br />request to the Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) on May 9, 2022. <br /> <br />Only one previously documented cultural resource has been documented within the file <br />search area. The resource, 5GN1103, comprises a prehistoric isolated find (IF), and is 0.35 mi. <br />northeast of the project area. <br /> <br />Six previous cultural resource inventories have been previously conducted within 1/2 mi. of <br />the project APE. These were completed from 1984–2006, in advance of reservoir and pond projects, <br />projects associated with the West Elk Mine, and an oil and gas project. Two of the surveys intersect <br />the current APE, comprising a methane drainage well project for the West Elk Mine (GN.FS.NR210) <br />and a seam drilling project for the mine (GN.FS.NR246). <br /> <br />General Land office (GLO) plats for the project area were also inspected to identify potential <br />historical sites that might be encountered during the inventory (Table 1). No cultural features are <br />depicted on either the 1885 original survey for Township 13S Range 90W, or the 1916 resurvey, that <br />encompass the project’s APE. Mapped resources within the file search area include a cabin and a <br />trail—the latter unnamed in 1885 but designated as the “U.S. Trail Paonia to Coal Creek” by 1916, <br />as well as the Minnesota Reservoir and a road that leads to the reservoir. Several labels noting “coal <br />cropping” are also depicted on the 1914 GLO plat for Township 14S Range 90W adjacent to, but not <br />within, the project area. <br /> <br />Several historical topographic maps were also consulted. These maps postdate the 1930s <br />and show similar resources as the GLO plat. The maps do not depict any histor ical resources within <br />the project area; nearby resources comprise the Minnesota Reservoir and a trail along Minnesota <br />Creek (Table 2). <br /> <br />Based on the results of the file search, the potential for prehistoric sites in the project area <br />was expected to be low. There was thought to be a higher probability for historical use of the project <br />area, likely associated with use along areas above Minnesota Creek and early mineral extraction. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.