My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-08-25_PERMIT FILE - M2022001
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022001
>
2022-08-25_PERMIT FILE - M2022001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2022 8:52:58 AM
Creation date
8/29/2022 9:39:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022001
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
8/25/2022
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Civil Resources, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6.3.2 Drain Recharge <br /> In order to keep groundwater from being exposed to evaporation and to help mitigate the shadow affect to the north a <br /> series of model iterations were run utilizing the Drain DRT MODFLOW Package. The Drain DRT package allows for the <br /> water removed from the drain cells to be recharged back into selected cells rather than removed from the model. The <br /> conceptual model was set to simulate recharge to an open bottom manhole placed between Cells 3 and 7 at the north of <br /> the model along with perforated pipe extending three (3)cells to the east and west.The majority of the recharge was <br /> placed in the manhole with the perforated pipe acting as shallow overflow mitigation. As shown in Table 7, piping the <br /> diverted water to the north of the Site will reduce the shadow affect on the wells to the north (Schmidt, United and Owens <br /> Wells)as well as reducing evaporation. <br /> Table 7 details three options for drain mitigation. Option 1 was modeled as the construction of all slurry walls at the Site <br /> and the water from the drain/wells was routed to the river by surface structures. For Option 2, slurry wall 5S was not <br /> constructed and the water was routed to the river by surface structures. Option 3 adds recharge north of the Site to <br /> Option 2. Option 3 is shown on Figures 7 and 7A. <br /> Table 7 <br /> Groundwater Surface Elevations with Drain Install 0 tions <br /> Option 2 <br /> Option 1 Drain <br /> Drain Option 1 Mitigation Option 2 Option 3 Option 3 <br /> Mitigation Difference (No Cell-5S Difference From Drain Mitigation Difference From <br /> Location Baseline All SW From Baseline SW) Baseline With Recharge Baseline <br /> Patrid a House 4736.5 47346 -1.90 47359 -0.6 47359 -0.6 <br /> Cline House 47371 47350 -2 10 47362 -0 9 47363 -0 8 <br /> Harding House 47369 4734.7 -2 20 4735.7 -1 2 4735.8 -1 1 <br /> Wiedeman House <br /> 13434 4738.4 4738 1 -0.30 47387 03 47388 04 <br /> Wiedman House 13218 47386 4740.2 160 47407 2 1 47408 22 <br /> Shape House 47385 47400 150 47405 20 47405 20 <br /> HS Land and Cattle 4732.7 47319 -0.80 47327 00 47328 01 <br /> Karbowski Brave <br /> House 47257 47232 -2.50 47242 -1 5 47245 -1.2 <br /> Schmidt Well 47146 47102 440 4710.9 -3 7 4712.8 -1.8 <br /> United Well 47123 47065 -5 80 47063 -6 0 47106 -1 7 <br /> Owens Well 47147 47115 -3 20 47115 -3 2 47124 -2 3 <br /> Wright House 47180 47119 -6 07 47116 -6 4 47130 49 <br /> Schmidt House 47192 4716.0 -3 20 47161 -3 1 4716.7 -2 5 <br /> Smit House 47196 47173 -2 30 47178 -1 8 47183 -1 3 <br /> Kissler House 47302 47296 -0.60 47306 0.4 47307 05 <br /> Woolverton House 47314 47310 -0 40 47320 06 47320 06 <br /> Shimon House 47336 47329 -0 70 4734.1 05 4734.2 06 <br /> Kern House 4734.4 47334 -1 00 47346 02 47346 02 <br /> Rainbolt House 47364 4734.9 -1 50 47360 -0 4 47361 -0.3 <br /> Gilcrest Valley HS 1 47378 47371 -0 70 47377 -0 1 47377 -0 10 <br /> Groundwater Model Report—Section 20 Gravel Mine Site -11 - August 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.