My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRMS Comment Objection Intake - DEV 8/23/2022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021068
>
DRMS Comment Objection Intake - DEV 8/23/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2022 9:03:07 PM
Creation date
8/23/2022 12:19:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021068
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/23/2022
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
Carl Schembri
To
DRMS
Email Name
BFB
BFB
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Email Address* <br /> Enter a valid email address in this field to receive a confirmation e-mail. <br /> carlschembri@rocketmail.com <br /> Your Phone Number* <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> 3033248626 <br /> Extension <br /> Alternate Phone Number <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> Alternate Phone Extension <br /> Connection to Operation <br /> Select all that apply <br /> ✓ Land Owner of affected land ✓ Structure Owner within 200' of affected land <br /> ✓ Mineral Owner Nearby Resident <br /> ✓ Adjacent Land Owner Concerned Citizen <br /> Government Agency Other <br /> DESCRIPTION OF COMMENT OR OBJECTION <br /> You are providing a comment or objection to the public record of a permitting action currently under review by the Division of <br /> Reclamation, Mining and Safety.This form is not intended for reporting of possible violations or illegal activity. Please be as specific <br /> as possible. <br /> Comment/Objection Narrative <br /> This objection pertains to application M-2021-068 <br /> 1.Can a survey of the proposed reclamation area be furnished?Has the survey been pinned?How do we know <br /> there is no encrouchment issues. <br /> 2.Can there be provided evidence that the supposed owner of the Gunnell#8 owns the waste rock pile that <br /> was extracted,from what appears on the map(and on the ground),the Grand Army#178?Have all owners of <br /> the Grand Army#178(or others depending on proposed acess point)been informed on a possible trespassing <br /> issues. It is my understanding that there is no legal access to the Gunnell#8. It is their understanding that the <br /> waste rock pile does not belong to the Grand Army, but rather the Gunnell#8?Please provide evidence. <br /> 3.Since my client owns several properties in the immediate area identified as the'Gunnell',can there be <br /> furnished a title commitment that proves the supposed owner of the Gunnell#8 has 100%ownership of the <br /> claim? <br /> 4.Are easements in place that provide legal access to the Gunnell#8?Can these be provided for review?Old <br /> mining trails/roads in Gilpin County are not considered prescriptive easements. <br /> Permit Number* <br /> Enter valid letter and then numbers,for example M1977999, M1999777UG or C1981201. <br /> M2021068 <br /> Permitting Action Type <br /> Select revision type or leave blank if comment pertains to a new permit application or NOI <br /> Permit Type <br /> County <br /> Gilpin <br /> Enter one county only <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.