My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-08-15_ENFORCEMENT - M1977410
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977410
>
2022-08-15_ENFORCEMENT - M1977410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2022 7:51:56 AM
Creation date
8/17/2022 10:46:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977410
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/15/2022
Doc Name
Petition to Repeal MLRB Finding
From
Robert Botts Jr. Stinson LLLP
To
DRMS
Email Name
JPL
JLE
CMM
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Division may be taking the position that in light of the Division's decision to designate <br /> GIR's Cross Mine as a Designated Mining Operation ("DMO"), a change in circumstances has <br /> occurred such that the Board should now consider whether or not to remove the Cease and Desist <br /> Order.Z The Division's DMO designation,however, is irrelevant to the issue of GIR's compliance <br /> with the Cease and Desist Order,and it does not actually constitute a change in circumstances that <br /> would otherwise affect the removal of the Cease and Desist Order. First, the Cease and Desist <br /> Order and, more specifically, GIR's compliance with the Corrective Actions set forth therein, <br /> which provide the basis for removing the Cease and Desist Order, is separate and unrelated to the <br /> Division's decision to designate the Cross Mine as a DMO. Second, the Division's preliminary <br /> decision to designate the Cross Mine as a DMO occurred on February 17, 2022, a day before the <br /> Board's Cease and Desist Order was issued, and almost three months before the Division issued <br /> its May 2022 Letter telling GIR that if it submitted water test results for April through June 2022 <br /> then it could request reconsideration from the Division regarding the removal of the Cease and <br /> Desist Order. In other words, the Division made its DMO designation prior to communicating to <br /> GIR what GIR needed to do to have the Cease and Desist Order removed—which GIR <br /> subsequently complied with—so there are no changed circumstances concerning the DMO <br /> designation that warrant continuing the Cease and Desist Order. <br /> B. Preventing GIR from Continued Mining Operations Would Harm GIR <br /> The Division's refusal to remove the Cease and Desist Order,despite GIR's full compliance <br /> with its terms, is causing unnecessary harm to GIR. Based on the Division's representations to <br /> GIR regarding the steps GIR needed to take to have the Cease and Desist Order removed by the <br /> Division, GIR, in turn, made numerous representations and promises to its investors and other <br /> z The Division's DMO designation is subject to a separate petition to the Board by GIR. <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.