My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-07-25_REVISION - M1976056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976056
>
2022-07-25_REVISION - M1976056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2022 8:45:05 PM
Creation date
7/26/2022 7:42:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/25/2022
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Environmental, Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM3
Email Name
NCG
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
McAtee Construction Company Page 4 <br /> Bank Armoring Plan <br /> asphalt rubble) needed to complete the spillway is 450 cubic <br /> yards . <br /> East Lake Bank Armorinq. <br /> In East Lake there is a 1, 260 foot section of lake bank within <br /> 100 feet of the west ditch that will be armored to urban drainage <br /> standards . The ditch bank armoring and much of the levee are on <br /> land now owned by McAtee Construction Company. During the 2013 <br /> flood even the levee kept the river from entering the area west <br /> of the west ditch bank, but water enter from over land sheet <br /> flows from south of Highway 6 and the raised groundwater <br /> elevation. It appears there is a short section near where the <br /> ditch turns to the northeast that may have been over- topped and <br /> the west ditch bank was damaged from here to the ditch overflow <br /> just south of the Permit boundary. This means that north of this <br /> point there was no direct connection between the ditch/river <br /> corridor so the water accumulated on the land south of the <br /> railroad until is soaked into the ground after the flooding <br /> ended. For this reason there is no way to construct inlet or <br /> outlet spillways in the east lake area that would have a direct <br /> connection to the river corridor. The option chosen for this <br /> area is to armor the bank following the UDFCD Guidelines . <br /> In this area the levee and armoring installed many years ago held <br /> up to the flood, the ditch company placed massive amounts of new <br /> armoring on the west bank and resized and improved the return <br /> flow spillway to allow flood water that enter the upper end of <br /> the ditch to return to the river without damaging the ditch. <br /> Because of the levee and the corridor armoring we proposed <br /> installing the lake bank armoring 100 feet from the west ditch <br /> bank along this section. The location of the armoring is shown <br /> on the 2022 revised Map Exhibit F - Reclamation Plan Map. <br /> At a minimum the toe of the armoring will be 3 feet below the <br /> lowest ground water level in the lake and 2 feet or more thick. <br /> This is approximately 2 . 35 cyd/lft for this area. The armoring <br /> will cover the bank slopes from the original ground surface to a <br /> depth of 3 feet below the water and parallel to the west side of <br /> the levee in each lake area. Once sloping begins the armoring <br /> will be installed on sections where mining is completed. The <br /> estimated total volume of inert fill (concrete and asphalt <br /> rubble) needed to complete the East Lake bank armoring is 2, 960 <br /> cubic yards (1, 260 ' ) and the south end of Lake Marjorie is 2, 170 <br /> cy (925 ' ) . <br /> The operator will keep enough material stored on the mine to <br /> complete armoring needed on any area where sloping is being <br /> completed and is ready for armoring. At no time will there be <br /> Revised - July 19, 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.