My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-07-19_REVISION - M1987026 (25)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1987026
>
2022-07-19_REVISION - M1987026 (25)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 9:52:38 PM
Creation date
7/19/2022 3:25:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987026
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/19/2022
Doc Name Note
Rule 6.5 - Geotechnical Stability Exhibit
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
Colorado Quarries Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CESARE,INC. <br /> 3. HAZARD ANALYSIS <br /> During the site visit on June 16, 2022, the CMTTS engineering geologist observed the area, measured <br /> the fracture sets, measured the rock mass rating (RMR) value for the rock mass, and created a <br /> stereonet of the fracture sets for kinematic analysis. <br /> 3.1 FIELD RMR VALUE CALCULATION <br /> For the obsidian outcrops: <br /> Weathering grade: I to II, fresh rock is exposed on the cut face <br /> Strength: weak to medium strong rock, estimated field value of 25 to 50 MPa <br /> Groundwater: completely dry except at the bottom of the pits <br /> Fracture sets: VII— 3 main joint sets with random fractures <br /> Fracture spacing: close spacing <br /> Low to medium persistence of fractures <br /> Aperture: "closed", 3 to 20mm <br /> No infilling <br /> Roughness: 2 to 4 <br /> Rock quality designation (RQD): field estimated value of < 50% <br /> RMR calculation: <br /> JA1=4, JA2=8, JA3=10, JA4=25, JA5=15, JB=(-25) <br /> RMR value 37 Class IV, Poor Rock <br /> RMR values for the rhyolite were not calculated because of its discontinuous nature and inconsistent <br /> character. It is concluded to be very poor rock overall. <br /> 3.2 STEREONET SURVEY <br /> A kinematic stereonet analysis of the fracture data was completed (Exhibit 4). The interpretation of <br /> the slope stability for this data set is that the cut face will be stable within plus or minus 200 of the <br /> present slope direction. If the high wall continues to follow the present strike, or within 200 of the <br /> present cut face, slope stability will be maintained. The multitude of fracture sets at close spacing <br /> and variable directions makes a large wedge failure or plane failure unlikely in the high wall. <br /> 22.6084 Obsidian Quarry Slope Consultation Letter 06.29.22 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.