My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-07-18_PERMIT FILE - M2022018
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022018
>
2022-07-18_PERMIT FILE - M2022018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2025 6:18:01 AM
Creation date
7/18/2022 12:53:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022018
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/18/2022
Doc Name
Objection Acknowledgement/Response
From
Wasteline, Inc / South Hindsdale Sand & Gravel LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
South Hinsdale Response to Objections <br /> 12 July 2022 <br /> available as well as lack of adequate transportation infrastructure to allow for fast <br /> emergency response. Increased erosion after fires as in Glenwood Canyon, Vallacito <br /> Reservoir, Fort Collins, and California, to name a few, have added significant costs for <br /> materials to effect repairs which is a significant financial burden for local, State, and federal <br /> taxpayers. Lack of concrete and asphalt due to cost either reduces homebuilding and the <br /> value of the residences, and/or creates INCREASED air and water pollution and potential <br /> for accidents releasing hazardous materials. <br /> (16) shortage of water <br /> Response: Section 5.2 <br /> (17) tax revenue to Hinsdale and not Archuleta County <br /> Response: Section 5.9 <br /> (18) economic impact on Archuleta and Pagosa Springs <br /> Response: Section 5.9 <br /> (19) request more investigation of site - not viable, feasible or appropriate <br /> Response: Section 5.10 <br /> (20) Select viable locations agreed upon by (all] communities and citizens <br /> Response: Section 5.1 and Section 5.10 <br /> (21) effect on water <br /> Response: Section 5.2 <br /> (22) independent third-party review of above items in 10-mile radius <br /> Response: Section 5.10 <br /> (23) gravel mining dust harmful to people <br /> Response: Section 5.8 <br /> (24)further review of above items <br /> Response: Section 5.10 <br /> NOTE: Jacqui Slavin also attached 5 images of which several are screenshots and many <br /> are photos of unidentified places but none appear to be of the proposed site or immediately <br /> adjacent to that site. Therefore, we are uncertain of the objection and unable to respond. <br /> See Section 5.4.2. <br /> 5182-22-003 WASTELINE, INC. Page 28 of 107 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.