Laserfiche WebLink
South Hinsdale Response to Objections <br /> 12 July 2022 <br /> List of two (2) items. <br /> (1) Piedra Road <br /> Response: Section 5.3 <br /> (2) North Pagosa Boulevard <br /> Response: Section 5.3 <br /> Note that Ms. Easterling submitted a second comment (see Section 2.12). <br /> 2.9 Scott Haskin <br /> received May 28, 2022— <br /> "Hello. I and the list of persons included in this submittal are very concerned about location <br /> of the operations. We spend much time in this area and it would be a tragedy to destroy it <br /> for a commercial gravel pit. We also have concerns about the amount of truck traffic on <br /> Piedra Road."—listed it as Archuleta County, identified WLI as operator, no list of persons <br /> included. <br /> List of three (3) items. <br /> (1) Piedra Road —truck traffic <br /> Response: Section 5.3 <br /> (2) location <br /> Response: Section 5.1 <br /> (3)environmental impact <br /> Response: Section 5.4 and Section 5.5 <br /> 2.10 Art Dilione - <br /> received May 28, 2022—by DBMS. *See also Section 3.42 received June <br /> 15, 2022—by County <br /> DRMS: List of sixteen (16) specific items with some overlap. The applicants very much <br /> appreciate his detailed, careful review and well-organized comments, and thank him for it. <br /> Among other things, he found a number of typos and errors, as well as confusing <br /> discussions, thus allowing us to correct those. Response to DRMS comments shown in <br /> black italic text. <br /> NOTE: In his correspondence with Hinsdale County, Mr. Dilione expanded on his DRMS <br /> comments (see Section 3.42) in the form of 4 "General Comments/Objections" and 20 <br /> "Specific General Comments/Objections;" To reduce duplication, we have added his <br /> comments for the County and included them in this section. County comments and our <br /> responses are shown in green. Again, we appreciate his concern for precision and clarity, <br /> and wish to thank Mr. Dilione for his diligent review and his assistance in improving the <br /> application and operation. Response to County comments shown in green italic text. <br /> (1) Exhibit A P 10 — (1 a) complains that Exhibit B directions for getting to site does not <br /> address the fact most of Piedra Road is in Archuleta County and (1b) does not address <br /> impact to Piedra Road <br /> Response: Section 5.3 This standard Exhibit is not used by DRMS to address locations of <br /> off-site roads which will be used, nor to address impacts to off-site roads. <br /> 5182-22-003 WASTELINE, INC. Page 14 of 107 <br />