My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-07-01_PERMIT FILE - M2022005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2022005
>
2022-07-01_PERMIT FILE - M2022005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2025 3:05:05 AM
Creation date
7/5/2022 8:39:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2022005
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/1/2022
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Blue Earth Solutions
To
DRMS
Email Name
PSH
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Connor Drinkard <br /> RE: Carr Pit East M-2022-005 <br /> June 27, 2022 <br /> Ecological Assessment and Conservation Blueprint. Additionally, we consulted with an <br /> ecological consultant familiar with the project site. AloTerra Restoration Services, LLC has <br /> provided preliminary wetland assessments on both the Carr Pit East site and the adjacent Carr <br /> Pit (M-2014-001) site. Additionally, AloTerra performed a jurisdictional wetland delineation <br /> and wildlife survey for the Carr Pit temporary crossing of Lone Tree Cree approximately one <br /> mile upstream from the Carr Pit East site. <br /> We acknowledge that Lone Tree Creek in the project area is a significant ecological resource, <br /> but we question the CPW standard buffer distance of 500 feet from the OHWM being <br /> applied to the creek. As a general or standard recommendation, the reference of OHWM and <br /> a 500-foot buffer seems applicable for perennial eastern plains rivers and streams such as the <br /> South Platte River where the river channels are 100 feet wide or more with associated <br /> floodplains that may extend a quarter mile away from the riverbank. The Lone Tree Creek <br /> channel, however, is generally less than a couple feet wide or even nonexistent. Through the <br /> proposed project area, the creek is ephemeral or intermittent at best, flowing primarily in <br /> response to substantial stormwater events or snow melt. The narrow channel and pools are <br /> generally located in the middle of the drainage bottom which varies from approximately 50 <br /> to 100 feet wide. The bottom of the drainage is commonly covered with a mix of wetland and <br /> facultative (equally likely to occur in wetlands and non-wetlands) grass species. From the <br /> drainage bottom, slopes typically rise abruptly at a 10 percent grade or steeper to the upland <br /> plain over 5 to 15 feet above. The adjacent upland plain is characterized by dry, and <br /> conditions dominated by short-grass or mixed-grass prairie. <br /> Mining is proposed within the upland areas of the project site. These upland areas do not <br /> contain suitable habitat for the SGCN referenced by CPW. Lone Tree Creek, the associated <br /> wetland area, and the drainage embankment do not contain significant aggregate deposits and <br /> are not included in the mining limits. Careful disturbance of the drainage embankment only <br /> occurs during reclamation activities to create a smooth and functional transition from the <br /> mine excavation to the creek drainage without creating areas where stormwater could pond <br /> (see attached photographs). <br /> We do not believe that the mining and reclamation activities, as proposed, create a significant <br /> threat to the SGCN listed by CPW or other wildlife within the project area. According to the <br /> SWAP, the greatest threats to the Northern leopard frog include loss of wetland habitat due to <br /> residential and commercial development and the introduction of invasive species such as <br /> bullfrogs and sport fish. Similarly, the greatest threats to the Brassy minnow and Northern <br /> redbelly dace include incompatible agricultural practices such as intensive livestock grazing, <br /> loss of habitat from residential and commercial development, changes to flow regimes from <br /> dams, diversions, and dewatering, and the introduction of invasive species. These threats will <br /> not be associated with the proposed mining and reclamation activities. <br /> During active mining, an overburden berm approximately 3 feet high will separate the Lone <br /> Tree Creek drainage area from mine excavations, haul roads, stockpiles, and other mining <br /> disturbances. The berm acts as stormwater management and as a safety barrier. Fortunately, <br /> mining at the Carr Pit East site produces rock in varying sizes so rock mats, rock dams, rock <br /> �b ue ear-th Page 2of12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.