Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br /> <br /> <br />2.04-121 Rev. 08/94- TR71, 06/95- PR06, 03/06- PR10;05/22- MR462 <br />The wind patterns of Site 3 significantly differed from those at Sites 1 and 2. Drainage flow at Site <br />3 came out of the south. In fact, there was a small component of the wind out of the south- <br />southwest which opposed the major drainage flow at the lower levels. This indicated that Site 3 was <br />above the major drainage flow at the lower levels and was simply measuring the light drainage from <br />the higher terrain above it directly to the south. Periods of upslope flow also indicated that the <br />terrain to the south of Site 3 dominated the winds at that site. Upslope flows were from the north, <br />with few exceptions. <br /> <br /> Temperature <br /> <br />The average diurnal variations in air temperature over the spring quarter at Sites 1 and 3 are <br />presented in Figure 13. Data from the summer quarter are presented in Figure 14. The primary <br />point of interest in both figures is the timing of the early morning temperature increase. During the <br />spring, the temperature began its daytime climb an hour earlier at Site 3 than at Site 1. The air <br />temperature during the summer quarter at Site 3 began its climb an hour earlier than at Site 2, which <br />preceded the climb at Site 1 by an hour. <br /> <br />This indicated that the cold drainage flows diminished in intensity and vanished at the upper sites <br />first. The vertical mixing and resulting upper-level flow coupling, which brought the relatively <br />warmer upper-level air down to the surface, began with Site 3 and proceeded then to the level at <br />Site 2, and finally reached Site 1 deep within the canyon about two or three hours after sunrise. This <br />was easily understood by realizing that the canyon and mountain sides were heated faster than the <br />canyon floor when the sun is low, as during the early morning. <br /> <br /> Relative Humidity and Precipitation <br /> <br />The relative humidity at Site 2 averaged 58 percent during the summer quarter. Too little data exist <br />for the spring quarter to make a meaningful comparison. Although this value seemed high, it should <br />be remembered that the site was within a deep mountain canyon sitting at the base of a large <br />mountain range. <br /> <br />The average relative humidity during the summer ranged from a 30 percent to 88 percent. The <br />highest humidity occurred during extremely cold drainage flows. The lower average relative <br />humidities occurred during unstable upslope flows. Overall, relative humidity ranged from five <br />percent to 100 percent. <br /> <br />The total accumulated precipitation at Site 2 for the summer period was l.60 inches. Because of the <br />low data recovery at Site 2 during the spring, the reported accumulation of 0.17 inches was not <br />believed to be representative of the springtime precipitation. <br /> <br /> Air Quality <br /> <br />Limited sampling at the West Elk site indicated relatively low concentrations of total suspended <br />particulate matter even with the aridity of the region. The particulate data collected over the <br />reporting period (March 1977 - March 1980) are presented in Exhibit 25. During this reporting <br />period, measured particulate values did not exceed the federal secondary standard for particulates or