Laserfiche WebLink
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />found at the Colowyo Mine. For South Taylor, the lowest seam currently considered to be mined is the <br />G8/9 seam. At Lower Wilson, the I seam is the main seam to be underground mined. <br />The South Taylor and Lower Wilson mining areas have similar lithology to that found in the current <br />Colowyo mine. However, the mining areas are located topographically and structurally higher than what <br />is encountered at the Colowyo mine. Therefore, the elevations of the base of the coal seam floor to be <br />mined in both of these areas are generally higher than the old surface elevation of the already mined East <br />and West Pits. <br />The topographic high and geologic structure in the South Taylor mining area (an anticline) provides little <br />recharge area for the underlying beds and seams. The Trout Creek sandstone, a major regional aquifer, <br />and the overlying coal sequence, outcrop west and southwest of these areas and thus are above any <br />sources for continuous water recharge. Thus, there is no source to contribute to artesian conditions in the <br />coal seams to be mined. Monitoring well MWST-06-04 has water at an elevation of 7,915 feet (below the <br />floor of the G9 seam), and piezometer PST -06-17 did not encounter water at or above the G8/9 seam. <br />These boreholes are shown on Map 10. <br />Perched bedrock groundwater will be found during mining activities. This has been confirmed by water <br />monitoring during drilling, short-term air lift tests, and an examination of the geophysical logs. This <br />water will contribute to a significant inflow of water during the boxcut and initial mining, but should <br />cease rather rapidly (2 years ±). No artesian groundwater conditions exist above the Km marker bed, a <br />proven regional aquiclude (confining layer), within the mining areas. <br />Groundwater Quantity — Transmissivity of the perched zones of the interburden within the Williams <br />Fork Formation ranged from 79 square feet per day (ft2/d) to 1,930 ft2/d. Corresponding hydraulic <br />conductivity ranged from 3.43 feet per day (ft/d) to 80.4 ft/d (CDM, 1985a; Table 2.04.7-26). The range <br />in values is indicative of the variability in the degree of fracturing in the formation. Published <br />transmissivity for the upper Williams Fork Formation is 33 to 95 ft2/d (Robson & Stewart, 1990). The <br />Fes, coal seam hydraulic transmissivity was 4.3 to 5.7 ft2/d and the conductivity was measured to be 0.24 <br />to 0.29 ft/d (CDM, 1985a). <br />The Trout Creek Sandstone just south of the Lower Wilson box cut was found to be dry (Well 84 -B -TC). <br />Other wells north of the Lower Wilson mine that intersected saturated portions of the Trout Creek closer <br />to the axis of the Collom Syncline had transmissivity that ranged from 2.06 to 4.57 ft2/d and had hydraulic <br />conductivity ranging from 0.086 to 0.29 ft/d. All of these values are considered to be indicative of <br />moderate permeability, and typical of relatively clean and/or fractured sandstone lithologic units (CDM, <br />1985a). <br />Storativity values for the Williams Fork Formation and Trout Creek Sandstone could not be estimated as <br />part of the CDM studies, however, observations made during drilling and monitoring suggest that the <br />water -bearing intervals are of limited saturated thickness and under confined conditions with significant <br />artesian pressure (CDM, 1985a). Storativity values (unitless) for the Fb coal seam ranged from 10-3 to <br />10-7, which are indicative of confined conditions. Storativity values for the Trout Creek Sandstone was <br />about 10-2. <br />In addition to the bedrock wells, studies of the alluvial/colluvial aquifers in the general area have also <br />been conducted. CDM slug -tested the wells to determine the hydraulic characteristics of the shallow <br />aquifers (CDM 1985a). A slug test consists of the introduction or removal of a known volume of water or <br />slug then subsequently measuring the water level through time in the well as the water level declines. For <br />each of the wells, a slug -in and a slug -out test were performed. The results of the slug tests performed on <br />the relevant alluvial wells are presented in Table 2.04.7-27. In 1985, monitoring well A-5 was destroyed <br />South Taylor/Lower Wilson — Rule 2, Page 21 Revision Date: 4/7/17 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />