My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-12-22_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2021-12-22_PERMIT FILE - C1981019 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2022 7:15:44 PM
Creation date
5/17/2022 6:30:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/22/2021
Doc Name
Salinity Material Damage Assessment
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 07 Item 16 Salinity Material Damage Assessment
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />6.5 Material Damage Conclusion <br />This assessment was implemented to evaluate whether irrigation water contains salinity values <br />which are causing materials damage to Cox, Elkhorn & Streeter, and Proctor fields on Goodspring <br />Creek. In addition, implementation of the study included collection of data and additional analysis <br />to support the material damage findings. A composition evaluation was implemented and revealed <br />that irrigated fields are not managed monocultures, rather field are composed of a combination <br />of alfalfa and pasture grasses, along with other grasses and forbs. Therefore, this site-specific <br />data was used in the material damage calculation. A soil study was also implemented to <br />investigate whether salt accumulation has been occurring in the irrigated fields. Laboratory results <br />do not demonstrate elevated salinity across the irrigated fields. Finally, crop yields from 2001 to <br />2020 were investigated to determine whether a diminishing trend could be identified. However, <br />the crop yields are more closely related to quantity of water received, which was variable from <br />year to year because irrigation water applied to the target fields are junior water rights. Based <br />on all the supporting studies and the calculated material damage assessment presented in Section <br />6.3 found that the crop yield reductions were not significant, in accordance with the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board report from 1988. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.