My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-04-29_REPORT - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2022-04-29_REPORT - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2022 2:26:19 PM
Creation date
4/29/2022 2:15:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/29/2022
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report Adequacy Review
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Annual Report Year
2020
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JLE
CJD
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Probable Hydrologic Consequences(PHC), Section 2.05 of <br /> New Elks mining and reclamation permit discusses the possibility <br /> increasing TDS. <br /> TDS/Sulfate levels in the alluvial wells have fluctuated <br /> significantly between the years 2019 and 2020 and appear to be <br /> within natural levels according to the report. <br /> T. Prevention of <br /> adverse impacts CDRMS Predicted impacts to ground water quality include increasing TDS <br /> to ground water regulation in the form of sodium and bicarbonate. <br /> systems outside 4.05.11 Elevated TDS levels in backfill aquifers are likely according to the <br /> the permit area PHC section of the New Elk permit. Well PAW 2 is completed in <br /> backfilled spoil. The elevated TDS levels in the backfill aquifers <br /> may be due to leaching from backfill material,reported levels are <br /> within their natural limits. <br /> The TDS and Sulfate levels are consistent with expectation in the <br /> PHC. Frequency and location of monitoring should be reevaluated <br /> with the mentioned incoming Permit Revision. <br /> Probable Hydrologic Consequences(PHC),predictions in Section <br /> 2.05 of New Elk's permit appear to be accurate for both surface <br /> and ground water. <br /> The frequency of monitoring was changed with TR73 to reduce <br /> U. Prevention of sampling during an inactive mining period. The data provided in <br /> material damage CDRMS AHR 2019 and 2020 is adequate for an inactive mine,however <br /> to the hydrologic regulation this will not be adequate for an active mine. <br /> balance outside 4.05.1(1) As previously noted by the Division in the adequacy review of <br /> the permit area TR73, historic data from NE-1-10 should be included in the AHR <br /> together with data from the current monitoring period. NE-1-10 <br /> is completed in the Allen seam, approximately 1000' from <br /> existing mine workings,down the projected potentiometric <br /> gradient. <br /> Overall,PHC predictions appear to be accurate, as illustrated by <br /> the following examples. <br /> New Elk does not anticipate recharge to shallow aquifer systems <br /> to be adversely affected by mining operations. Water levels in <br /> wells have remained stable during recent monitoring. <br /> V. Agreement of Per the PHC,constituent concentrations in backfill aquifers, <br /> observed CDRMS namely TDS and sulfate,are expected to be higher than pre- <br /> hydrologic regulation mining concentrations for an extended period of time after mining. <br /> impacts with 2.05.6(3) <br /> PHC projected in The data for TDS concentrations in wells in backfill aquifers have <br /> permit shown apparent impacts from mining. Sulfate concentrations <br /> exhibit similar trends as TDS. <br /> TDS/Sulfate levels in these wells should continue to be monitored <br /> in future years. <br /> Backfill aquifers will continue to have an impact on surface base <br /> flow water quality (TDS),conditions. <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.