My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-09-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2021-09-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2023 2:22:44 PM
Creation date
4/27/2022 2:26:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/3/2021
Doc Name
Permits
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />Colowyo has four monitoring wells in the the Trout Creek Sandstone. Of the four ColowyoTrout Creek <br />monitoring wells, monitoring well C-05-33 (Sec. 11, T.3N., R.94W.) in the southern part of the Collom <br />permit expansion area (Map 1013), was drilled as part of the Collom project. This Trout Creek Sandstone <br />in this monitoring well is dry. The surface elevation of the well casing is 8,353 ft. ams], with the top of <br />the Trout Creek Sandstone at 7,586 ft. amsl. The other three Colowyo wells drilled into the Trout Creek <br />sandstone were drilled prior to 2000. These wells are located north and east of the Collom project area. <br />A fifth well drilled into the Trout Creek Sandstone was drilled by Utah International (DH -76-8), shown <br />on Map 1113, as an exploration hole and was allowed to remain open by Utah International. <br />These wells all contain water under confined conditions. The locations of these monitoring wells are as <br />follows: <br />DH -76-8 about a half -mile northeast of the Collom Pit (Sec. 36, TAN., R.94W.); <br />W-95-02 about two miles east of the Collom Pit (Sec. 5, T.3N., R.93W.); <br />W-95-15, approximately two miles northeast of the Collom Pit (Sec. 29, T.4N., R.93W.); and <br />UL -95-45, approximately 4.5 miles east-northeast of the Collom Pit (Sec. 27, T.4N., R.93W.). <br />Along the southern reaches of the stream channels, the deeper units of the Williams Fork Formation, <br />down to the I coal sequence outcrop. The stream channels cut through successively higher stratigraphic <br />units from south to north on the southern limb of the Collom Syncline. The valleys provide drainage for <br />the shallower coal and sandstone units. As a result of these conditions, the southern portion of the <br />groundwater basin consists of a sequence of perched groundwater zones. In general, the groundwater <br />levels occur within the respective water -bearing units. Conditions in the southern portion of the Collom <br />permit expansion area are therefore similar to those at the existing Colowyo mine. Groundwater is present <br />as perched zones in the upper coal seams and sandstone units, and seeps are typically associated with <br />perched water tables in the uppermost coal seams. At the existing mine, these seeps normally drain within <br />a few weeks, although sustained seeps recharged by upgradient drainages also occur, with a total <br />discharge of approximately 15 to 25 gallons per minute (gpm). With increasing depth below the <br />elevations of the adjacent stream channels, the bedrock units become fully saturated and groundwater is <br />present under confined conditions. <br />Hydraulic Characteristics - Previous studies by CDM (1985a), Dennis (2001, 2006) and WMC (2005) <br />determined the hydraulic characteristics of the bedrock aquifers in the Williams Fork Formation and the <br />Trout Creek Sandstone. The results of these studies are presented in Table 2.04.7-39, Table 2.04.7-40 and <br />Figure 2.04.7-33 and are discussed below. <br />The valley -fill aquifers have moderate to high permeability where encountered and exhibit a wide range <br />of hydraulic conductivity values. They exhibited the highest geometric mean hydraulic conductivity (3.2 <br />feet per day (friday)) but also showed a very wide range (0.001 to 196 ft/day). Because of their limited <br />thickness, however, they typically have relatively low transmissivity. Storativity was not determined by <br />the testing, but values in the range typical for unconfined aquifers can be expected. <br />The most permeable bedrock units are in the F/G sequence of the Williams Fork Formation (F sandstone <br />through Gc coal seams) and the Trout Creek Sandstone. The sandstone units of the Williams Fork <br />Formation typically have lower permeabilities than the coal seams. The coal seams have hydraulic <br />conductivities ranging from approximately 0.002 to 0.77 ft/day and a geometric mean of 0.14 ft/day. The <br />highest hydraulic conductivities were observed in the Fab and G seams. The sandstone units have <br />geometric mean hydraulic conductivity values ranging from approximately 0.002 ft/day (H sandstone) to <br />0.008 ft/day (F sandstone). The geometric mean hydraulic conductivity for all the sandstones of the <br />Williams Fork Formation is 0.006 ft/day. The Trout Creek Sandstone exhibited a range of hydraulic <br />conductivity values between 0.006 and 0.09 ft/day and a geometric mean of 0.02 ft/day, indicating that it <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 24 Revision Date: 4/7/17 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.