My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-09-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2021-09-03_PERMIT FILE - C1981019A (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2023 2:22:44 PM
Creation date
4/27/2022 2:26:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
9/3/2021
Doc Name
Permits
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume 15 Rule 2
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />The axis of the Collom syncline is approximately parallel with the Axial Basin anticline and as previously <br />mentioned passes through the northern portion of the Collom permit expansion area. Bedding orientation, <br />as measured on surface outcrops, has a strike of around North (N) 70° West (W). Dips on the shared limb <br />with the Axial Basin anticline can exceed 45°, but are normally between 25° and 350 and dip to the south. <br />The south flank of the syncline has dips between 5° and 20° to the north (Map 7A). <br />South and east of the Collom permit expansion area is the Wilson Creek Dome, part of the Danforth Hills <br />anticline. A producing petroleum reserve, the dome is capped by the Iles Formation. This uplift has <br />caused the Lower Wilson area to be uplifted and only the bottom 750 feet of the Williams Fork is present. <br />The beds in this area have a strike to the northwest with dips to the northeast of approximately 7°. <br />Two nearly vertical joint sets have been identified in the Williams fork formation in the Collom permit <br />area. The primary joint system has a strike ranging between N55°W and N60°W. The secondary joint <br />system has a strike of N 19°East (E). <br />No faults have been identified in theCollom permit area. These was accomplished by examining the <br />geologic cross setions in and around the Collom pit area and looking for any potential large offsets <br />between drill holes. In addition, any available downhole geophysical logs from the drill holes used in the <br />cross sections, and adjacent holes to the cross sections, were examined for any repeats in the logs or <br />missing coal sections while the Colowyo drill hole database was prepared. In addition, field work <br />examined many of the sandstone exposures and no evidence of faulting in the Collom pit area has not <br />been found. <br />In addition, the Collom permit area location on the southern limb of the Collom syncline is similar to the <br />current location of the Colowyo active mining area, east of the Collom pit. During the nearly 40 years of <br />mining in the current mining area, no faulting has been noted during the extraction of the coal. Thus, <br />since the geologic conditions in the Collom area are similar to the current mining area, no faults should be <br />expected to be found either. <br />Exploration Test Borings <br />Exploration test borings have been conducted within the Collom mining area and have been used for the <br />following purposes: <br />Identifying Location of Subsurface Water - Several drill holes throughout the area encountered minor <br />amounts of groundwater; however, all of the data obtained to date by Colowyo and the United States <br />Geological Survey (USGS) have indicated that groundwater occurrences in the Williams Fork Formation <br />in the area are not continuous but rather are a series of perched systems of limited lateral and vertical <br />extent. Information on groundwater occurrence is provided in section 2.04.7. <br />Characterizing Physical Properties of the Overburden - The overburden material, which is removed as <br />a part of the mining operation, consists mainly of mudstones, siltstones, and sandstones. Generally, the <br />mudstones will have a relatively high erodibility and compaction factor, while sandstones and siltstones <br />will have low erodibility factors and low to moderate compaction. Because of the variable lithology and <br />lenticular nature of the strata in the Collom permit expansion area and the variations in the mining <br />techniques, it is difficult to determine an actual value for the swell of the overburden; therefore, the <br />overall swell of the overburden material was estimated to be approximately 20 percent. <br />Evaluating Geochemical Properties of Overburden - Exploration holes were located in the mining area <br />for evaluation of the coal resources in the Collom mining area during the 2004 — 2006 geologic study. <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 15 Revision Date: 4/7/17 <br />Revision No.: RN -07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.