Laserfiche WebLink
Point of Compliance Well Investigation <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />AECOM <br />2 <br /> <br />1.2 Previous Studies <br />To address Stipulation 7, Colowyo previously completed a review of existing groundwater quality <br />data for the Mine (Peterson Hydrologic, LLC 2015). The objectives of this review were as <br />follows: <br />• Characterize the shallow groundwater systems in Wilson Creek, Taylor Creek, and Good <br />Spring Creek drainages in the vicinity of the Mine; <br />• Determine whether there is evidence that mining- and reclamation-related activities have <br />had detrimental impacts to water quality in the groundwater systems in these drainages; <br />• Determine the likelihood that impacts to these groundwater systems may occur in the future <br />as a result of the mining- and reclamation-related activities at Colowyo Mine; and <br />• Provide recommendations regarding the need for groundwater points of compliance. <br />The Petersen Hydrologic report concluded that groundwater points of compliance were not <br />required due to several factors including exceedances of water quality standards in upgradient <br />areas, lack of domestic and agricultural wells in the downgradient alluvial valleys, limited <br />potential for vertical groundwater migration, low recharge to the alluvium, mitigation through <br />post-mining reclamation, and lack of significant impacts to sampled groundwater in the alluvial <br />valleys. <br />An expanded Points of Compliance Evaluation Report was subsequently prepared by AECOM <br />(2018). The AECOM report included further analysis of hydrologic data collected both prior to <br />and after the 2015 Peterson Hydrologic report. The study also evaluated specific <br />considerations for establishing points of compliance as contained in the Rules and Regulations <br />of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining (1980 et seq.), Rule <br />4.05.13(1)(b). Based on the data analyzed and AECOM’s interpretation of the rule, it was <br />concluded that groundwater points of compliance were not needed for Colowyo Mine. This <br />conclusion was reached considering the degraded water quality in alluvial groundwater <br />upgradient from the Mine; the lack of water supply wells downgradient of the Mine in the alluvial <br />valleys; the success of reclamation at the Mine and lack of increasing trends in constituent <br />concentrations since 2006; and the low risk of lateral and vertical migration of alluvial <br />groundwater into the surrounding bedrock. <br />The Division responded on November 6, 2018 with an adequacy review of the AECOM report <br />but did not agree to remove the permit stipulation requiring point of compliance wells. In March <br />2019, AECOM assisted the Mine in preparing a response letter discussing key details of the <br />Points of Compliance Evaluation report. After submittal of this response letter, the Division <br />reiterated their stance that compliance wells were needed. In a letter dated April 2, 2019, the <br />Division requested that Colowyo provide updated text and maps as necessary including point of <br />compliance well locations to satisfy Rule 4.05.13. <br />1.3 2019-2021 Groundwater Investigation Approach and Objectives <br />Colowyo already has three downgradient monitoring wells at the Mine: Gossard Well in the <br />Wilson Creek drainage, MT-95-02 in the Taylor Creek drainage, and NGSW in the Good Spring <br />Creek drainage (Figure 1). However, these wells are known to contain elevated concentrations <br />of some monitored constituents, and therefore may not be suitable as permanent point of <br />compliance wells. Rule 4.05.13(1)(b) also states that “points of compliance shall be monitoring <br />locations in addition to any other monitoring points required by the Division”, implying that <br />separate point of compliance wells are needed to meet the intent of the Rule. Colowyo thus