My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-03-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017036
>
2022-03-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 5:45:08 AM
Creation date
3/17/2022 8:51:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017036
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/16/2022
Doc Name
County Special Use Permit
From
Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete
To
DRMS
Email Name
BFB
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
conflict-of-interest rule, Larimer County Code § 2-67(10) (2018),2 <br /> violated due process as applied to Commissioner Donnelly's <br /> participation in the Board's review of Ready-Mix's application. <br /> { The Board and Ready-Mix cross-appeal the court's order <br /> reversing the Board's decision approving Ready-Mix's application <br /> pursuant to NLGC's C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) claim for judicial review. <br /> Though we agree with the district court that the Board misapplied a <br /> provision of the Larimer County Land Use Code (Land Use Code), <br /> we conclude that the Board's error does not warrant reversal. <br /> Thus, we reverse that portion of the district court's judgment and <br /> remand the case for further proceedings. <br /> I. Background <br /> A. Factual Background <br /> In December 2016, Ready-Mix filed a special review <br /> application with the Larimer County Planning Department <br /> (Department) seeking a permit to construct and operate a sand and <br /> gravel mine near Laporte, Colorado. It also sought approval for a <br /> 2 The Larimer County Code has since been amended, but the <br /> amendments do not affect the substance of the arguments <br /> raised. This opinion references the sections of the code in effect at <br /> the time of the Board's challenged decision. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.