My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-03-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017036
>
2022-03-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 5:45:08 AM
Creation date
3/17/2022 8:51:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017036
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/16/2022
Doc Name
County Special Use Permit
From
Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete
To
DRMS
Email Name
BFB
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. The Board's Abuse of Discretion as to Land Use Code Section <br /> 4.5.3(F) was Harmless <br /> Having concluded that the Board did not misapply Land Use <br /> Code section 4.5.3(C), we return to whether the Board's <br /> misapplication of Land Use Code section 4.5.3(F) warrants reversal. <br /> We agree with the defendants that it does not. <br /> -)5 "The harmless error rule applies to judicial review of <br /> administrative proceedings [in a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action], and <br /> errors in such administrative proceedings will not require reversal <br /> unless [p]laintiffs can show they were prejudiced." Sheep Mountain <br /> All. v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs, 271 P.3d 597, 606 (Colo. App. 2011) <br /> (quoting Bar MK Ranches v. Yuetter, 994 F.2d 735, 740 (10th Cir. <br /> 1993)). Indeed, "[w]here the agency's mistake did not affect the <br /> outcome of the proceedings, `it would be senseless to vacate and <br /> remand for reconsideration."' Rags Over the Ark. River, Inc. v. Colo. <br /> Parks & Wildlife Bd., 2015 COA 11 M, ¶ 65 (quoting Jicarilla Apache <br /> Nation v. U.S. Dept of Interior, 613 F.3d 1112, 1121 (D.C. Cir. <br /> 2010)). <br /> The Board misapplied section 4.5.3(F) by failing to consider <br /> whether the batch plant constituted an allowable "accessory use" <br /> 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.