My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-03-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017036
>
2022-03-16_PERMIT FILE - M2017036
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 5:45:08 AM
Creation date
3/17/2022 8:51:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017036
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
3/16/2022
Doc Name
County Special Use Permit
From
Loveland Ready-Mix Concrete
To
DRMS
Email Name
BFB
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
produced by the mining operation to manufacture concrete. That <br /> the batch plant was predicated on — and secondary to — the <br /> existence of the mining operation was thus evident from the <br /> framework of the project itself. <br /> I) Moreover, in its briefing to the Board on the "accessory use" <br /> issue, Ready-Mix represented, among other things, that <br /> • the mining operation would occupy ninety-six percent of the <br /> property, while the batch plant would occupy four percent; <br /> • the planned investment in the mining operation was <br /> $9,860,000, as opposed to only $1,500,000 for the batch <br /> plant; and <br /> • of the $788,900 reclamation bond that Ready-Mix intended to <br /> post with the Colorado Division of Reclamation Mining and <br /> Safety, ninety-seven percent of the bond can be attributed to <br /> mining, and only three percent to the batch plant. <br /> Additionally, at the hearing on the application, the senior <br /> planner of the Department testified that, from his department's <br /> perspective, a concrete batch plant is a "normal ancillary or <br /> pertinent use" to a sand and gravel operation. He also <br /> acknowledged that "[i]t has historically been Larimer County's <br /> 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.