Laserfiche WebLink
IV. Judicial Review of the Board's Findings <br /> 3 The Board and Ready-Mix cross-appeal, arguing that the <br /> district court erred by entering judgment in favor of NLGC on the <br /> C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) claim. Specifically, they contend that the stated <br /> premise underlying the court's decision was erroneous: the Board <br /> did not, as the court found, misapply Land Use Code section <br /> 4.5.3(C) or (F) in approving Ready-Mix's application. Accordingly, <br /> they ask that we reverse the court's judgment. <br /> Like the district court, we conclude that the Board misapplied <br /> section 4.5.3(F), albeit for a different reason. However, we agree <br /> with the Board and Ready-Mix that the Board did not misapply <br /> section 4.5.3(C). And, as we explain below, the Board's application <br /> of section 4.5.3(C) rendered any infirmity in its application of <br /> section 4.5.3(F) harmless. Thus, we reverse the district court's <br /> judgment and remand for further proceedings. <br /> A. Relevant Provisions of the Land Use Code <br /> 66 To approve a special review application, the Board must <br /> consider several "review criteria" enumerated in Land Use Code <br /> section 4.5.3 and find that each criterion has been met or is <br /> inapplicable. Section 4.5.3(C) and (F) provide two such criteria. <br /> 32 <br />