My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-02-22_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2022-02-22_PERMIT FILE - C1980007 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2022 2:08:03 PM
Creation date
2/24/2022 2:02:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/22/2022
Doc Name
2.04-12 Thru 2.04-50
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04.6 Geology Description
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />2.04-45 Rev. 11/04- PR10, 04/06- PR10, 09/07- PR12, 10/08- PR14; 01/22- MR459 <br />Seam mining was under the least amount of cover, chances of surface water, combined with <br />shallow overburden and/or major fractures, impacting mining operations would have been <br />highest in the F Seam. Underground mapping of miles of F Seam workings has shown a <br />relationship between shallow cover under drainages and poor roof conditions caused by water, <br />but has not shown a clear-cut relationship between fracture zones and wet roof conditions, with <br />the exception of the Sylvester Gulch entries. <br /> <br />Since the E Seam is deeper than the F Seam, it can be assumed that the effects of shallow <br />overburden and fracture related water on underground mining operations in the E Seam would be <br />less than in the F Seam, even though immediate roof rock sequences and types a re similar. The <br />B Seam is deeper still, and seems to have more competent roof rocks than the E and F Seam, so <br />it can be assumed that near surface and fracture related water would have little impact on a <br />mining operation in the B Seam. Where depths of cover are less, water may be encountered <br />beneath the more prominent drainages. <br /> <br />Groundwater in the inactive zone is ancient stored water residing in sand channel bodies, within the <br />porous sections of fluvial or marine sand lenses, or within the damaged zones or fault and fracture <br />systems. The strata containing water surrounding the West Elk Mine region has ancient water in the <br />inactive zone that has been age dated to approximately 10,500 years (A. Mayo, 1998). The <br />residence time is consistent with similar non-tributary water found in coal mines of the Wasatch <br />Plateau and Book Cliffs of Utah. Melt-off of Pleistocene glaciers from the West Elk Mountains <br />south and east of MCC’s coal lease holdings provided an ample source of water of the appropriate <br />age as the source for the inactive zone water. <br /> <br />In coal mines inactive zone inflows typically occur as: <br /> <br />1. Roof inflows from sandstone channels located in the lower portion of the Mesaverde Group. <br />Inflows from overlying sandstone channels issue from roof bolt holes, vertical borings, or the <br />bottoms of channels exposed during mining. <br /> <br />2. Floor inflows occurring as springs from shoreface and foreshore marine sandstones. <br /> <br />3. Roof and or floor inflows issuing from damage zones associated with faulting. These damage <br />zone inflows can significantly increase the inflow rates and total volumes of flows associated <br />with marine sandstone springs. In unusual circumstances minor amounts of near surface (active <br />zone) groundwater can enter the mine environment along fault damage zone. <br />The A through C Seam coal sequence is sandwiched between two large marine sandstone bodies, <br />the Rollins and Bowie Sandstones. These sands have moderate to good porosity at 5 to 16 <br />percent, but with a permeability of .001 Darcy or less. These marine sandstones could store <br />water but don’t. Inflows from roof channels or springs not associated with faulting are rare or <br />nonexistent. Indeed, exploration drilling on or near MCC’s coal leases during the past 40 years <br />has not encountered significant water in the coals or sandstones. Perched aquifers are rarely <br />encountered and have restricted lateral extents. <br /> <br />The low transmissivity and poor aquifer characteristics of the coals have also been evidenced by <br />interception of water bearing fault systems in the B Seam development. On four separate
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.