Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />2.04-36 Rev. 11/04- PR10, 04/06- PR10, 09/07- PR12, 10/08- PR14; 01/22- MR459 <br />occur locally within all seams, but none are projected in the mineable areas. The burned areas <br />are generally small (about 4 percent) and occur mainly near the coal outcrops. <br /> <br />Projections of weathered areas are based on core hole data, topographic relief, and topographic <br />slope orientation. The lateral extent of weathering is assumed to be greatest where topography is <br />gentle, such as adjacent to broad, shallow valleys. Depth of weathering on north-facing slopes is <br />assumed to be greater than on south-facing slopes, everything else being equal. Floor and roof <br />conditions will deteriorate in areas of lower cover where weathering has progressed far enough <br />to weaken clays and shales. <br /> <br />Effects of Slopes <br /> <br />Most of the high relief terrain is located in the northern and eastern portions of the lease area <br />where slopes of 30 to 70 percent are common between the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek, Deep <br />Creek, and the North Fork. Within the Box Canyon permit area, the very steep topography <br />prevents vehicular access and even makes pedestrian access difficult. Total topographic relief of <br />the area exceeds 3,000 feet. South of the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek in the South of Divide <br />and Southern panels permit area, the topography generally exhibits less vertical relief, but <br />gradually increases in elevation to 9,100 feet. <br /> <br />There is a marked asymmetry of the valley side profiles in the area. This asymmetry is caused by <br />micro-climatic differences on opposite sides of the valley. This results in variation of soil <br />development, which in turn influences erosion rates. The interbedded shales of the Mesaverde <br />Formation, when moist, are susceptible to movement and weathering which promotes erosion, <br />mass-wasting, and downslope movement of the overlying sandstone materials. This increased <br />mobility of the moist shales leads to a gradual decline in slope angle. Thus, the northerly-facing <br />slopes generally are not as steeply inclined as the southerly-facing slopes. <br /> <br />Map 31 and Map 31A are slope maps in which the topographic inclination has been broken down <br />into categories. Note that over 90 percent of the area has slopes steeper than 15 percent and, <br />therefore, is unsuited for most activities except general recreation or engineered structures. Some of <br />the narrow valleys on the property could be used for building sites, but relatively steep slopes <br />adjacent to these valleys are subject to soil movement or slump and rock falls. <br /> <br />Steep Topography <br /> <br />The effects of steep topography on mining conditions have been difficult to define and quantify. <br />Geotechnical theory holds that rapid topographic change over a significant area causes stresses <br />related to differential load, and that these stresses can cause roof control problems in mining. <br />Areas of steep topography have been defined by using arbitrary guidelines of 33.3 percent slope <br />over a minimal slope width of 500 feet. Topographic slopes in excess of 70 percent are limited <br />to the cliff faces along Minnesota, Dry Fork, and Lick Creeks and on the perimeter of West <br />Flatiron Mesa. About 11 percent of the mine area has been defined as steep topography. The <br />greatest effect of topography was in the northern and eastern one-third of the property, where <br />topography is generally the steepest. <br />