Laserfiche WebLink
24. Section 2.5.1 was revised to include commitment to salvage "topsoil"form all areas of the mill <br /> facility. <br /> 25. Zephyr reviewed the Division's IMP closure specifications and commits to closing the portal and <br /> vent rise according to the specification. <br /> 26. Section 2.5.5 (formerly 2.5.4) was revised to clarify that the contract water pond and contact <br /> water pond discharge channel will remain until the FTSF cap is approved by the Division. <br /> 27. The seed mix table is correctly labeled as Table 2.5.6-1. <br /> 6.4.6 Exhibit F—Reclamation Plan map <br /> 28. The map title block, legend and drafting criteria are corrected. <br /> 29. The subject FTSF slope was reanalyzed for erosion control and is now benched every 28 vertical <br /> ft. <br /> 30. Contours are added and revised on FTSF for drainage. <br /> 31. Jesik: Drainage plan for erosion control structures. Culverts under the main road include the <br /> road goes east west. 32b is in the drainage report <br /> 32. a. Culverts and sizing are included in the Appendix N Jesik Surface Water Management Plan. <br /> b. Appendix N Jesik Surface Water Management Plan includes justification for drainage <br /> structures in higher peak flow areas. <br /> 33. Exhibit F is revised to show new roads, improved existing roads and existing roads. <br /> 34. The contact water pond is appropriately contoured to represent final reclamation slopes. The <br /> pond liner will be removed during reclamation. The pond sides will be graded to blend with <br /> surrounding topo. <br /> 35. The formerly labeled "Process water channel" is appropriately labeled as "On site Stormwater <br /> Diversion Channel." <br /> 6.4.7 Exhibit G—Water Information <br /> 36. a. Reference to the Department of the Interior is removed from the application narrative. <br /> b. Section 2.7.5 is revised to reflect one sedimentation pond aka stormwater detention pond <br /> that is located at the north end of the overburden pile. <br /> 37. Figures 1 and 2 in Exhibit G and Figure 2.4.2-1 are updated to reflect mine boundary and <br /> mapped fractures. <br /> 38. The wells are not completed in the same material and it was intended that the monitoring wells <br /> would be completed in the two differing geologic units which are separated by faulting to allow <br /> for the investigation of conditions on both sides of the faulting. <br /> 39. Both the construction details for the wells and the lithology encountered by their boreholes are <br /> presented in the Well Construction and Test Report(GWS-31) on file with the DWR are included <br /> in Section 2.7.1. Discussion of the monitoring well lithology is added to Section 2.7.1. <br /> 40. Section 2.7.4 Monitoring Well Network is updated to provide more robust monitoring regime. <br /> Figure 3 in Exhibit G depicts the monitoring locations and compliance well. <br /> 41. Section 2.7.4.1 Point of Compliance Well(s) is added to Exhibit G. <br /> 42. The DGM Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) is provided in Appendix M. <br /> 43. Table 2.7.4-1 reflects the most restricted values for groundwater data comparison. <br /> 44. Zephyr commits to commencing five consecutive quarters of baseline groundwater quality data <br /> upon the Division's approval of the proposed monitoring well network provided in Section 2.7.4. <br />