Laserfiche WebLink
12/21/21,8:14 AM State.co.us Executive Branch Mail-(With picture)Fwd:Questions/Concerns Tucson South Application <br /> STATE OF Lennberg-DNR, Patrick<patrick.lennberg@state.co.us> <br /> COLORADO <br /> (With picture) Fwd: Questions/Concerns Tucson South Application <br /> 1 message <br /> mcsfh157@aol.com <mcsfh 1 57@aol.com> Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 3:33 PM <br /> Reply-To: mcsfhl57@aol.com <br /> To: "patrick.lennberg@state.co.us"<patrick.lennberg@state.co.us>, "jared.ebert@state.co.us"<jared.ebert@state.co.us> <br /> Sorry- I forgot to include this picture detailing the property where neighbors are stating that Al's mining activities have <br /> spread to Aurora's land-see pic below. <br /> Weld N (F County PORTAL <br /> m . <br /> zw� <br /> Pii U 0 <br /> .01 <br /> o•..wMaa�wte amustms wca Q .. ;_ -u ..R � `Ifi <br /> A.— <br /> Seca t aMP R gr, • �'4 S/ <br /> :<-- Lam.• !i <br /> a .na <br /> Sherie Gould, GRI <br /> Broker Associate <br /> Sterling Real Estate Group,Inc <br /> 303.919.1703 Cell <br /> ---Original Message---- <br /> From: mcsfhl57@aol.com <br /> To: patrick.lennberg@state.co.us<patrick.lennberg@state.co.us> <br /> Cc:jared.ebert@state.co.us<jared.ebert@state.co.us> <br /> Sent: Mon, Dec 20, 2021 3:18 pm <br /> Subject: Questions/Concerns Tucson South Application <br /> Hello Patrick, <br /> Wondering if you could clarify a couple of questions for me (I did research but couldn't find an answer) <br /> 1. Per the rules it states that the applicant shall (in essence) provide notice to the land and structure owners. <br /> Reviewing the certified mail receipts I am aware that at least one VERY CRITICAL landowner was never"noticed"and <br /> that one would likely have much to say. How does this affect this application/timing/decision making? <br /> 2. 1 had noted several comments in the review portion that asked Al if there was enough space in the 50' conveyor <br /> easement to conduct repairs, etc. stating that it was/could be a violation of the permit if they were outside that <br /> boundary. <br /> Regarding operating outside of the boundaries, and it being a violation. . . .the DRMS might want to examine some of <br /> Al's activities in the Wattenberg permit. In the fall of 2020, the City of Westminster deeded the "triangular parcel(land <br /> -Wattenberg) back over to Al because they have requirements on that property related to wetland mitigation. As <br /> these requirements are Al's, the City granted them those acres back so that they could manage directly and have <br /> liability directly." <br /> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=Of6l 963367&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3Al 7l 9706151066720640&simpl=msg-f%3Al 7l 97061510... 1/2 <br />