Laserfiche WebLink
Snell & Wilmer <br /> <br />January 21, 2022 <br />Page 2 <br />Commercial uses are generally limited to those associated with Agricultural and Recreational <br />uses.” The permit sought by the Application does not contemplate any use associated with either <br />agricultural or recreational purposes. The Application itself states that the project’s purpose is “to <br />produce construction materials,” including both mining and processing of those materials. See <br />Application, Attachment 6, p. 1. It goes on to say that the projected is intended to “operate over a <br />period of up to 20 years” and produce approximately “72,000 tons per year of construction <br />materials to be shipped” from the property. See Application, Attachment 6. Production will <br />include “[a]ctual mining and haul of material from the site.” See id. The Application further <br />indicates that a processing plant used for “crushing and screening” will be located on the property, <br />in addition to other structures, such as above-ground fuel storage and equipment. See id. A major <br />mining and processing operation intended to produce construction materials is not consistent with <br />agricultural and recreational use of the land. <br />Beyond the inconsistencies with an AR zoning designation, Section 9 of the Land Use <br />Code details numerous conditions and limitations concerning the operations under a Major Sand <br />& Gravel Permit. See Land Use Code § 9.1.6. These restrictions exist for good reason—as stated <br />by the applicant itself, there “are obviously significant impacts which may occur” as a result of the <br />proposed project. See Application, Enclosure 7-D. Some of those potential negative impacts and <br />concerns include but are not limited to the following: <br />• A substantial increase in industrial traffic through residential, <br />recreational, and commercial areas; <br />• A substantial increase in harmful and excessively loud industrial <br />noises and vibrations; <br />• Pollution to the air and nearby waters and lands; <br />• Encroachment upon neighboring landowners’ views of the Pagosa <br />Springs wilderness and surrounding areas and otherwise harmful <br />effects to the scenic quality of the surrounding area; and <br />• A substantial increase in unsavory and annoying smells dispersed <br />throughout the surrounding area as a result of the mining, <br />processing, and transportation activities. <br />These potential impacts and concerns will undoubtedly harm neighboring landowners and the <br />general public of Pagosa Springs. Primarily, health and safety concerns to individuals, cattle, <br />livestock, and wildlife will likely arise due to pollution, excessive noise, and increased industrial <br />traffic. In turn, those problems and concerns will reduce the ability for landowners to engage in <br />agricultural and grazing activities. <br /> To be sure, this is not a mere hypothetical exercise—some of these issues have already <br />arisen, as the applicant apparently has already begun mining activities on the property. Water <br />runoff from those activities is running directly from the gravel pit area and into a neighboring <br />landowner’s pond. Noise from the project is also noticeable from our clients’ residences. And