My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-01-19_REVISION - M1976007UG (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976007
>
2022-01-19_REVISION - M1976007UG (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2024 6:38:32 AM
Creation date
1/19/2022 11:55:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976007UG
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/19/2022
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
Gabriel Sabadell
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Your State <br /> CO <br /> Your Zip Code <br /> Maximum of 10 digits. (Example)80202 <br /> 80007 <br /> Email Address <br /> Enter a valid email address in this field to receive a confirmation e-mail. <br /> gpsabadell@comcast.net <br /> Your Phone Number* <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> 7205496770 <br /> Extension <br /> Alternate Phone Number <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> Alternate Phone Extension <br /> Connection to Operation <br /> Select all that apply <br /> Land Owner of affected land Structure Owner within 200' of affected land <br /> Mineral Owner Nearby Resident <br /> Adjacent Land Owner Concerned Citizen <br /> Government Agency Other <br /> DESCRIPTION OF COMMENT OR OBJECTION <br /> (Please be as specific as possible, <br /> Comment/Objection Narrative <br /> We live in the Spring Mesa Subdivision in Western Arvada. From our house we have a direct, line of site view of <br /> the existing scar from the mining operations.As nearby homeowners,we have concerns/objections based on <br /> aesthetics(i.e.concerns of further scarring of the landscape),potential air quality issues especially if operations <br /> are increased,and potential adverse impacts to property value. <br /> As avid hikers(both in Golden Gate Park and White Ranch)and cyclist who passes by/near that area,we have <br /> concerns/objections based on potential impacts to wildlife and habitat,the inadequate restoration/reclamation of <br /> historic mining,and the incompatibility with recreational activities.We are also concerned of the impact to air <br /> quality and potential traffic and congestion if the operations increase. <br /> Lastly, it appears that sufficient deficiencies have been identified(both by the City of Golden and Protect the <br /> Hogback)with the current permit application that the permit does not merit consideration.At a minimum, prior to <br /> any further action,the permit must be resubmitted with all noted deficiencies addressed and with proper <br /> notification and opportunity for potentially affected parties and the community to review the resubmitted <br /> application. <br /> Permit Number* <br /> Enter valid letter and then numbers,for example M1977999, M1999777UG or C1981201. <br /> M1976007 <br /> Permitting Action Type <br /> Select revision type or leave blank if comment pertains to a new permit application or NOI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.