My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-12-29_PERMIT FILE - M2021009 (34)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021009
>
2021-12-29_PERMIT FILE - M2021009 (34)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 2:53:23 AM
Creation date
12/29/2021 12:26:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021009
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/29/2021
Doc Name Note
Appendix B - Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Lewicki & Associates/Young Ranch Resource, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region <br /> Project/Site: Young Ranch Resource City/County: Gilpin and Clear Creek Sampling Date: 12/9/2021 <br /> Applicant/Owner Young Ranch Resource State: CO Sampling Point: DP-2U ARC <br /> Investigator(s): Tyler Worley Section,Township,Range: Section 28 Township 3 S,Range 72 W <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Topographic drainage Local relief(concave,convex,none)- concave Slope(%): 4-6% <br /> Subregion(LRR): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Region(LRR E) Lat: 39.76139 N Long: -105.44444°W Datum- NAD83 <br /> Sod Map Unit Name: Tahana-Legault-Rock outcrop complex,30-70%slopes NWI classification: R4SBC <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes q( No (If no,explain in Remarks.) <br /> Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes No <br /> Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. <br /> Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No <br /> Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area <br /> Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No <br /> Remarks: <br /> Within topographic drainage east of Central City Parkway.Classified as a palustrine unconsolidated bottom wetland. <br /> VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet: <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii 10 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC, 2 (A) <br /> 2' Total Number of Dominant <br /> 3• Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) <br /> 4. <br /> Percent of Dominant Species <br /> 10 =Total Cover That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50% (A/B) <br /> Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size- 15' ) <br /> 1 Rosa woodsii 50 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: <br /> 2 Picea pungens 20 Y FAC Total%Cover of: Multiply by: <br /> 3 Acer glabrum 10 N FACU OBL species x 1 = <br /> 4 FACW species 10 x 2= 20 <br /> 5. FAC species 20 x 3= 60 <br /> 80 FACU species 70 x 4= 280 <br /> =Total Cover <br /> Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5- ) UPL species x 5= <br /> 1 Juncus ensifolius 10 Y FACW Column Totals. 100 (A) 360 (B) <br /> 2 Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.60 <br /> 3• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 4. _ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation <br /> 5• _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% <br /> 6• _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' <br /> 7• _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting <br /> 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) <br /> g. _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' <br /> 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) <br /> 11. 'Indicators of hydre soil and wetland hydrology must <br /> 10 Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. <br /> = <br /> Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) <br /> 1 Hydrophytic <br /> 2. Vegetation / <br /> Present? Yes No y <br /> =Total Cover <br /> %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 15% <br /> Remarks: <br /> Does not meet criteria for hydrophytic vegetation. <br /> US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.