My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-12-29_PERMIT FILE - M2021009 (34)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021009
>
2021-12-29_PERMIT FILE - M2021009 (34)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2025 2:53:23 AM
Creation date
12/29/2021 12:26:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021009
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/29/2021
Doc Name Note
Appendix B - Aquatic Resource Delineation Report
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Lewicki & Associates/Young Ranch Resource, LLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region <br /> Project/Site: Young Ranch Resource City/County: Gilpin and Clear Creek Sampling Date: 11/15/2021 <br /> Applicant/Owner: Young Ranch Resource State. CO Sampling Point DP-1 U AR B <br /> Investigator(s): Tyler Worley Section,Township, Range. Section 28 Township 3 S,Range 72 W <br /> Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Topographic drainage Local relief(concave,convex,none)- concave Slope(%). 4-6% <br /> Subregion(LRR): Rocky Mountain Range and Forest Region(LRR E) Lat: 39.75709'N Long: -105.44457°W Datum: NAD83 <br /> Soil Map Unit Name: Tahana-Legault-Rock outcrop complex,30-70%slopes NWI classification: R4SBC <br /> Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V/ No (If no,explain in Remarks.) <br /> Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? NO Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes V No <br /> Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) <br /> SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features, etc. <br /> Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ <br /> Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area <br /> Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No <br /> Remarks <br /> Within topographic drainage east of Central City Parkway. Classified as a palustrine unconsolidated bottom wetland <br /> VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. <br /> Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: <br /> Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species <br /> 1 Pseudotsuga menziesii 10 Y FACU That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0 (A) <br /> 2' Total Number of Dominant <br /> 3. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) <br /> 4. <br /> Percent of Dominant Species <br /> 10 =Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 0% (A/B) <br /> Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' ) <br /> 1 Acer glabrum 40 Y FACU Prevalence Index worksheet: <br /> 2 Picea pungens 5 N FAC Total%Cover of. Multiply by: <br /> 3 Rosa woodsii 30 FACU OBL species x 1 = <br /> 4. FACW species x 2= <br /> 5 FAC species 5 x 3= 15 <br /> Total Cover <br /> 75 FACU species 80 x 4= 320 <br /> = <br /> Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' ) UPL species x 5= <br /> 1 Y FACU Column Totals: 85 (A) 335 (B) <br /> 2• Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.94 <br /> 3• Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: <br /> 4• 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation <br /> 5• _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% <br /> 6. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' <br /> 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting <br /> 8 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) <br /> g _ 5-Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' <br /> 10. _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) <br /> 11. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must <br /> Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. <br /> = <br /> Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size, ) <br /> 1• Hydrophytic <br /> 2 Vegetation / <br /> Present? Yes No 1/ <br /> =Total Cover <br /> %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 15% <br /> Remarks: <br /> Does not meet criteria for hydrophytic vegetation. <br /> US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.