My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-12-09_REVISION - C1981010 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2021-12-09_REVISION - C1981010 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2021 6:35:19 AM
Creation date
12/9/2021 9:47:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/9/2021
Doc Name
Proposed Decision and Findings of Compliance
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Type & Sequence
SL23
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reclaimed vegetation are suitable for the approved post-mining land uses. The Division has observed <br /> livestock grazing and substantial wildlife use of previously reclaimed areas. The revegetation success <br /> standards were based on what would be necessary for the land to properly function to accommodate the <br /> post mine land uses. Based on the achievement of these requirements,the Division finds that the <br /> revegetation on the Trapper Mine reclaimed areas is capable of supporting post-mining land use. <br /> Ground Water Impacts <br /> TMI monitors the quality and levels of ground water in various wells throughout the site. Mine backfill <br /> aquifers are monitored from wells GD3, GFS, GF7 and GF 11. These four wells were not included <br /> within the SL23 Phase III bond release area. However,because they are used as ash monitoring wells, <br /> they are sampled and are representative of backfilled aquifer conditions. Historical data from the <br /> backfill wells indicate leachate forms in the spoil/ash backfill. This leachate is alkaline, and high in <br /> dissolved solids (TDS),mainly sulfates. This concentration may continue for several hundred years, as <br /> predicted for the Seneca II Mine in Routt County, Colorado(USGS Water-Resources Investigations <br /> Report 92-4187). The alkalinity(pH near 7), appears to have prevented significant mobilization of <br /> metals in the spoil/ash backfill. <br /> At the northeast end of active mining GLEV-1 monitors the R coal aquifer and Well GC-3 Middle <br /> Flume monitors the Q seam alluvium. TDS concentration in GLEV-1 appear steady. Well GC-3 <br /> exhibited a gradual decline in water levels as mining moved into the area of response. Up gradient <br /> mining has moved east of this well. Well GP-9,Trapper's groundwater point of compliance monitors the <br /> Third White Sandstone immediately downgradient from Trapper's pits at a location where a leachate <br /> plume can be expected to form, as explained in the PHC. The 2020 data from well GP-9 does not reflect <br /> any new exceedances of the Basic Standards for Ground Water for a domestic use classification based <br /> on the parameters analyzed. There continues to be an exceedance of the drinking water standard for Mn; <br /> however,Mn exceedances also occurred in well GP-9 prior to mining in the area up gradient of this well. <br /> Other groundwater quality factors (e.g., concentrations of TDS and sulfate)continue to remain within <br /> historical sampling ranges and indicate that coal spoil leachate has not reached GP-9. The Coy well is <br /> the groundwater point of compliance for the Flume Gulch alluvium, as explained on page 4-242 of the <br /> permit application. Sampling data from 2020 indicates no exceedances of the Basic Standards for <br /> Ground Water for the classification of agricultural use at the Coy well. <br /> F, and Z pits have mined the Q and R coal seams and therefore the QR aquifer constitutes the major <br /> aquifer of interest for this bond release as the bond release block comprises parcels from former pits F <br /> and Z. Mining in A Pit utilized H and I coal seams making up the HI aquifer. Well GC-3 monitors the <br /> Q seam alluvium, GF-6,monitors the Q coal,GP-5, and GP-9,monitor the QR and third white <br /> sandstone respectively. GMP-, GP-3 and GP7 monitor the HI aquifer. Water levels in GP-5 and GF- <br /> 11(a backfill aquifer), generally trend up. F pit mining has not significantly affected water levels in GP- <br /> 5. <br /> TDS concentration in the QR aquifer are monitored downgradient at well GF-6 and have shown little <br /> influence from up gradient mining other than a very slight overall increasing trend,well within natural <br /> variations. TDS concentration in wells GP-5 and GLEV-1 appear steady with a slightly lower <br /> concentration in GLEV-1. The Probable Hydrologic Consequences (PHC)section of Trapper's mining <br /> and reclamation permit(Section 4.8.3), discusses the possibility of a high TDS plume of coal spoil <br /> leachate forming in the Third White Sandstone downgradient from the Trapper Mine in Section 29-T6N- <br /> Permit Number. C1981010 Page 13 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.