Laserfiche WebLink
24. Prevention of Comparisons with the Basic Standards for ground water and the <br /> material damage to CDRMS baseline water data are discusses in item 19. above. MCM <br /> the hydrologic regulation believes that no significant impacts from mining have occurred <br /> balance outside the 4.05.1(1) on the groundwater system as a result of mining. <br /> permit area <br /> Section 2.05.6 of the permit discusses the probable hydrologic <br /> consequences of the mining operation at the Williams Fork <br /> 25. Agreement of CDRMS Mines. This section primarily discusses monitoring results and <br /> observed hydrologic trends from the 80's and early 90's. The possible impacts <br /> impacts with PHC regulation discussed are very general and predict that mining should have <br /> projected in permit 2.05.6(3) no significant impact on the hydrologic balance. MCM reports <br /> that no significant,unpredicted,or adverse impacts were noted <br /> during hydrologic monitoring for 2020. <br /> The ground water monitoring program appears adequate at this <br /> time. <br /> MCM is reminded that well 9BF is required to be sampled on a <br /> 26. Adequacy of CDRMS quarterly basis if the No. 9 Mine waste rock backfill area has <br /> groundwater regulation undergone final grading. Water level monitoring is required on <br /> monitoring program 4.05.13(1) a quarterly basis. <br /> MCM needs to determine sampling status of the YAW alluvial <br /> wells,inform DRMS of the sampling frequency and update the <br /> permit and future AHR submittals. <br /> 27. Adequacy of surface CDRMS The surface water monitoring program appears adequate at this <br /> water monitoring regulation time. <br /> program 4.05.13(2) <br /> Page 6 <br />