My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-12-02_REPORT - C1981044
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981044
>
2021-12-02_REPORT - C1981044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2022 3:55:15 PM
Creation date
12/3/2021 5:56:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/2/2021
Doc Name
Annual Hydrology Report Adequacy Review Response
From
DRMS
To
Moffat County Mining, LLC
Annual Report Year
2020
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RAR
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Division compared the 2020 monitoring results for each <br /> well with the Basic Standards of Ground Water and the <br /> Baseline Water data tables provided in Tables 14 to 20 in the <br /> Williams Fork Mine permit. <br /> Regarding the Middle Sandstone well TR4; conductivity, <br /> sodium, sulfate,chloride, and boron concentrations were <br /> elevated compared with baseline levels and are below the <br /> maximum levels recorded at the site. The pH levels were <br /> above the drinking water standards and within baseline levels. <br /> Well TR-7a is within the expected flow path of mine leachate. <br /> Well TR-7a data indicates the parameters monitored at this well <br /> are within their baseline water quality levels. The pH levels at <br /> this well were above and below the drinking water standard and <br /> within the baseline levels. <br /> Well 81-01 sulfate,manganese and iron concentrations were <br /> above the baseline water quality levels for this well and are also <br /> above the basic standards of groundwater. Calcium and <br /> chloride concentrations were above the baseline levels and <br /> below the basic standards for groundwater. Sodium levels are <br /> also above the baseline water quality levels. Magnesium <br /> concentrations were the highest ever recorded at this location. <br /> Regarding the Twenty Mile Sandstone;concentrations in Well <br /> 259 are within historic ranges and consistent with baseline <br /> CWQCC water quality concentrations. <br /> 19. Basic Standards for Ground Water regulationsMagnesium, sodium,chloride,boron, sulfate and calcium <br /> 41.4 and 41.5 showed lower concentrations than in 2019 for the No. 9 Mine <br /> Well. <br /> Regarding the Williams Fork Alluvium well AVF-3, <br /> concentrations were within the baseline water quality levels. <br /> The lowest measured value of 5mg/l was recorded for sulfates. <br /> This reading appears to be an anomaly. <br /> Well AVF-5 exhibited sulfate concentrations above basic <br /> standards for groundwater and within historical ranges. <br /> Manganese concentrations were the highest measured in AVF- <br /> 5. Only manganese was found to be above the basic standard <br /> for groundwater. However,the baseline levels were also above <br /> the standard. Well AVF-6 water quality was within historic <br /> concentration ranges. The MCM report states that no impact <br /> on alluvial water quality has occurred. <br /> MCM did not provide an explanation for any of the maximum <br /> concentrations observed in the wells mentioned above and the <br /> cause of the elevated concentrations remains unclear. <br /> Additional analysis may be warranted by MCM in the future <br /> to determine if they are mine related <br /> Section 4.05.13(1)of the Regulations requires the <br /> establishment of one or more ground water points of <br /> compliance (wells),for an operation possessing the potential to <br /> negatively impact ground water quality. It does not appear <br /> round water points of compliance wells have been established <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.