My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-10-26_REVISION - M1976007UG (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1976007
>
2021-10-26_REVISION - M1976007UG (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2024 4:42:43 AM
Creation date
10/26/2021 10:55:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976007UG
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/26/2021
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
Brandon Carrino
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comment/Objection Narrative* <br /> Brandon Carrino <br /> 1520 Jesse Ln. <br /> Golden,CO 80403 <br /> 847-636-6063 <br /> Brandon@pureaire.net <br /> Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br /> 1313 Sherman Street, Rm.215 <br /> Denver,CO 80203 <br /> Sent via email: Eric.scott@state.co.us;drms info@state.co.us <br /> Posted at: https:Hdnriaserfiche.state.co.us/Forms/DRMS Comment <br /> Subject: <br /> File#M1976007-Denver Brick Company Proposal to Convert from 110 to 112 Permit <br /> To Whom it may concern: <br /> I object to the mining application referenced above for the reasons set forth below. I politely request that the <br /> application be denied by the DRMS Board.Stir water runoff from the ACME mine expansion and storage is an <br /> obvious concern for the Palustrine area,and also for the tributary of Van Bibber Creek just to the north.This <br /> tributary is mapped as a Zone AE on the FEMA floodplain,as well as on the CNHP wetlands mapper. <br /> In the screenshots below,you will see a violation of Stormwater Planning assessed against ACME Brick.This <br /> does not instill confidence that our local watersheds will be protected by ACME's expansion plans. <br /> How can ACME insure that they can adequately protect our streams and wetlands from mining and materials <br /> storage runoff if they have a history of negligence? <br /> This one details out a lack of an updated stormwater plan in Arkansas.With the proximity of the palustrine area <br /> and the creek,this one was conspicuous... <br /> https://www.adeq.state.ar.us/downloads/webdatabases/inspectionsonIine/041078-i nsp.pdf <br /> This one is an EPA violation regarding stormwater as well... <br /> https://www.epa.gov/sites/defau It/files/2020-08/documents/acme_esa_respondent_signed-short.pdf <br /> This is another stormwater issue in Arkansas... <br /> https://www.adeq.state.ar.us/downloads/WebDatabases/inspectionsOnIine/088302-insp.pdf <br /> I ask that you deny the Permit Conversion based on the fact Acme has violations which are well documented, <br /> and would directly conflict with your leasing agreement with the leaser. <br /> Please see:CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REGULAR 112 OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT <br /> APPLICATION FORM <br /> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yl mbkbe13fk11 z9/2021-08-02_REVISION%20-%20M 1976007UG.pdf?dl=0 <br /> Permit Number* <br /> Enter valid letter and then numbers,for example M1977999, M1999777UG or C1981201. <br /> M1976007 <br /> Permitting Action Type <br /> Permit Revision <br /> Select revision type or leave blank if comment pertains to a new permit application or NOI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.