My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-09-16_REVISION - M1983033
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1983033
>
2021-09-16_REVISION - M1983033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2025 7:35:53 AM
Creation date
9/16/2021 8:51:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983033
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
9/16/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
Albert Frei & Sons Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM9
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Walstrum Spur Amendment,Geotechnical Stability Exhibit Revised September 2021 <br /> Table 1: Slope Stability Modeling Results <br /> OVERALL SLOPEOF <br /> SECTION DIP OF ROCK SEISMIC FACTOR OF DRMS FoS <br /> ABOVE 8000 BELOW 8000 COEFFICIENT SAFETY REQUIREMENTS <br /> 1 41 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 i 0.00 2.63 1.3 <br /> 1 41 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 0.12 2.12 1.15 <br /> I <br /> 1 31 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 0.12 2.18 1.15 <br /> 1 51 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 0.12 2.11 1.15 <br /> 2 Homogeneous N/A 0.6:1.0 0.00 2.42 1.3 <br /> 2 Homogeneous N/A 0.6:1.0 0.12 2.12 1.15 <br /> 3 41 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 0.00 2.49 1.3 <br /> 3 41 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 0.12 2.17 1.15 <br /> 4 i 41 Degrees 1:1 0.6:1.0 0.00 3.14 1.3 <br /> 4 41 Degrees 1 1 0.6:1.0 0.12 2.73 1.15 <br /> 5 41 Degrees N/A ' 0.6:1.0 0.00 3.76 1.3 <br /> 5 41 Degrees N/A 0.6:1.0 0.12 3.19 1.15 <br /> 6 Xf mogeneous N/A 0.6:1.0 0.00 5.68 1.3 <br /> 6 Xf Homogeneous N/A 0.6:1.0 I 0.12 4.65 I 1.15 <br /> Hypotheticald of Low Strength Rock in FootwallSlope <br /> 10-ft-thick Xb <br /> 2 0.6:1.0 0.12 1.15 1.15 <br /> at 35 Degrees <br /> 2 j 20-ft-thick Xb i - ----,-- --_-at 35 Degrees' 0.6:1.0 0.12 0.95 i 1.15 <br /> "Sensitivity analysis <br /> 6.5.5 Kinematic Studies <br /> As mentioned earlier, geophysical logging was used to determine foliation trends and identify structural <br /> discontinuities. The data provided by Jet West were uploaded into RocScience DIPS for analysis. As is typical <br /> with metamorphic rock, the degree of folding can make analysis challenging because of the dynamic geometry. By <br /> observing the foliation trends for 100-foot depth intervals, it can be seen that while the majority of the foliation planes <br /> dip toward the north at around 40 degrees, the pole of the predominant joint set changes azimuth by 10 to 20 <br /> degrees and dip by around 10 degrees between those 100-foot depth filtered intervals. <br /> Some features that appeared to be open fractures or disconformities were identified in the geophysical logging. <br /> When 100-foot intervals are prepared, there are very few intervals that have more than four poles with the same <br /> pole (+/-5 degrees in azimuth and or dip). This is indicative of a generally wide fracture spacing. <br /> Planar failure may occur if a geologic disconformity dips out of the rock slope at an angle that is shallower than the <br /> angle of the slope and greater than the effective friction angle along the disconformity, as shown with the <br /> hypothetical layer of low strength biotite gneiss. The work of Wylie and Mah in Rock Slope Engineering (Wylie & <br /> Mah 2004) notes that planar sliding is not possible if the dip direction of the discontinuity differs from the direction <br /> of the face by more than 20 degrees. The stereonets presented in Appendix F indicate that there are foliation <br /> OTETRA TECH Page 31135 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.