Laserfiche WebLink
[C-21 I <br />HISTORY <br />COLORADO <br />Daniel Cunningham <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: New Elk Mine (Permit No. C-1981-012) Permit Revision Application No. 5 (PR-5), Permit Revision 5 <br />(HC# 71066) <br />Dear Mr. Cunningham, <br />Thank you for your correspondence dated and received by our office on July 7, 2021 requesting review of the <br />above referenced undertaking under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and its <br />implementing regulations 36 CFR Part 800. <br />In accordance with the 1991 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between our agencies, because the <br />technical revision may incorporate additional lands into the permit area or might otherwise alter previously <br />approved permit conditions or mitigation measures, concurrence between our agencies is required due to the <br />potential for impacts to cultural and/or historic resources. <br />The provided documentation notes that the permit revision would result in the expansion of the New Elk <br />Mine's permit boundary by 2,856 acres for the purposes of expanding subsurface mining operations. This has <br />the potential to affect cultural resources through development of infrastructure, temporary use areas, and <br />reclamation activities as well as through reasonably foreseeable effects such as subsidence and ground <br />vibrations. In order to complete our review, we request additional information on the proposed development <br />of the area for mining, temporary use areas (i.e. access roads and staging areas), and potential extent of effects <br />posed by subsidence and ground vibrations. Please provide additional descriptions, maps, designs, and images <br />as necessary to provide us an understanding of the proposed undertaking and the area of potential effects <br />(APE). <br />An initial review of our records shows that cultural resource specialists have inventoried a dearth of the <br />expanded permit boundary location and that at least one previously recorded historic property (5LA.5925) sits <br />in the APE. A review of previous studies in the region and acrial images shows the potential for previously <br />unidentified cultural remains in the proposed expansion area including archaeological remains. Further, an <br />initial review of historic topographic maps show that the APE may contain previously unidentified historic <br />structures including structures associated with the town of Vigil. Expansion of mining in this area has the <br />potential to affect these types of cultural resources. <br />Due to the dearth of previous inventory and the potential for previously unidentified cultural resources in the <br />project location, it is our recommendation that a cultural resource inventory be completed by a cultural resource <br />specialist who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards prior to construction activities to determine the <br />presence of cultural resources in the APE and to assess the eligibility of any resources for the NRHP. The cultural <br />resource specialist should also evaluate the undertaking's potential effects to historic properties. This level of <br />effort is recommended in accordance with 36 CFR 800.4(b)(1). <br />A list of qualified contractors that may provide the above services is available on our website: <br />hops://www.histoiycolorado.org/sites/de fault/files/media/document/2021/1502%202.25.21.docx.pd£ Upon <br />completion of the appropriate identification efforts, our office should be provided with the results of the cultural <br />resource inventory for review of professional adequacy and compliance with regulations, as well as to evaluate the <br />appropriateness of the recommended effect finding. <br />