My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-08-30_REVISION - M1990057
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1990057
>
2021-08-30_REVISION - M1990057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 1:50:55 PM
Creation date
8/31/2021 8:31:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1990057
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/30/2021
Doc Name
Objection
From
Welborn, Sullivan, Meck & Tooley, P.C.
To
DRMS
Email Name
DMC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 24, 2021 <br /> Page 3 <br /> near that amount of throughput. The amount of particulates leaving the Mill property will be much <br /> higher than it ever was in the past. <br /> Section 4.2.6 of the Application addresses dust control, but only within the Mill buildings. <br /> The Application also indicates that two ore stockpiles will be located immediately to the west of <br /> the District's polishing pond. Application, Exhibit C, Figure 3-3. The District is concerned that <br /> handling large amounts of ore outside will lead to dust blowing onto its polishing pond and aeration <br /> basin, potentially impacting its water quality and operations. <br /> Dust from the road running next to the District's property boudary and polishing pond is <br /> also a concern. At a minimum,this road should be paved. The District is already hard pressed to <br /> meet compliance limits imposed by CDPHE. See JVA Memo. <br /> Tailingsge Facility <br /> The Application indicates that the TSF will be completed in the spring of 2021. Was it? <br /> It will also be based on stability analysis performed by CTL Thompson a decade ago. Application, <br /> Exhibit D, Section 4.3, and Appendices 22-5 and 22-6. The District has concerns about whether <br /> the work was done according to plan and whether such old engineering is sufficient. Moreover, <br /> the technical specifications for the TSF, including its liner, are not as robust as those for solid <br /> waste facilities elsewhere that contain materials less hazardous than those the Applicant will be <br /> handling. The District is concerned that the TSF could fail, leading to leakage of contaminants <br /> into groundwater and the District's collection system. See JVA Memo. <br /> The Application states that a leak detection system for the TSF will be installed in the <br /> spring of 2021. If cyanide leachate is detected in groundwater, then the groundwater will be <br /> pumped back into the impoundment and DRMS will be notified within 48 hours. Section 4.3.6 of <br /> the Application does not say anything, however, about stopping operations or fixing the leak. <br /> The District also understands that there was a recent rain event that caused one of the <br /> Applicant's ponds partially to collapse. Such an incident concerns the District about the <br /> Applicant's ability to build and operate expanded milling in a way that will not affect the District's <br /> facilities. <br /> Seismic Impacts <br /> The District is also concerned about the potential damage to its facilities from the <br /> Applicant's seismic activity. The District's wastewater treatment facility consists of a headworks <br /> for screening and grit removal, two aeration basins, two covered clarifiers, a polishing pond, and <br /> a chlorine contact chamber for disinfection. The Applicant's operation of heavy crushing <br /> equipment next door to the District's infrastructure threatens to crack foundations and pipelines <br /> that the District needs to operate its water treatment facilities. The District is further concerned <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.