My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRMS Comment Objection Intake 8/30/2021 9:11:55 PM
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021046
>
Comment Objection 46056 8/30/2021 (2)
>
DRMS Comment Objection Intake 8/30/2021 9:11:55 PM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2024 1:22:22 PM
Creation date
8/30/2021 9:15:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021046
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
8/30/2021
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
Elaine Katsulos
To
DRMS
Email Name
TC1
TC1
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Your Phone Number* <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> 3036667672 <br /> Extension <br /> Alternate Phone Number <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> Alternate Phone Extension <br /> Connection to Operation <br /> Select all that apply <br /> Land Owner of affected land Structure Owner within 200' of affected land <br /> Mineral Owner ✓ Nearby Resident <br /> Adjacent Land Owner Concerned Citizen <br /> Government Agency Other <br /> DESCRIPTION OF COMMENT OR OBJECTION <br /> as specific as possioi(, <br /> Comment/Objection Narrative <br /> Operator asserts it is an"environmentally benign project,"yet the mine site at 6,500 feet elevation is 1,000 feet <br /> higher elevation than Grape Creek and the Arkansas river. It is upstream from the water plant intake for <br /> Fremont County.Any discharge from mining operations will find its way to the aquifers underground and/or the <br /> water flows.The mining operation would use approximately 65,000,000 gallons of water per year and an <br /> unspecified amount of chemicals.With the site just 1,000 feet above the Grape Creek and Arkansas River area, <br /> this creates the potential for pollution of the water for present and future generations. <br /> The demand on underground aquifers has been estimated in the permit as"insignificant"but there is no <br /> monitoring or measures to be sure that the demand is having an"insignificant"impact. <br /> There would be"approximately 13,000 pounds of explosives onsite for up to a week of blasting activity... <br /> replenished weekly".Adding explosives to an area already a tinder box for a wild fire could create a wild fire <br /> that wipes out the entire region particularly without an established fire protection plan.There is no Fire <br /> Protection plan associated with the current application.The mine location is in a juniper forest,semi-arid climate <br /> which is essentially a tinder box. <br /> Reclamation plans and budget are insufficient.Only$261,813 has been reserved for reclamation of the <br /> "affected area"when the mine shuts down. <br /> PLEASE do not approve this mining permit application! It promises only 90 jobs yet jeopardizes so much land <br /> and water. <br /> Permit Number* <br /> I <br /> Enter valid letter and then numbers,for example M122112211 or C123456789. <br /> M2021046 <br /> Permitting Action Type <br /> Select revision type or leave blank if comment pertains to a new permit application or NOI <br /> Permit Type <br /> Mining <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.