My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-07-27_REVISION - M2001022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2001022
>
2021-07-27_REVISION - M2001022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2024 10:06:21 AM
Creation date
7/28/2021 6:15:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001022
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/27/2021
Doc Name
Objection
From
Jamie Christensen
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AR4
Email Name
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RE <br /> hi L� <br /> DI <br /> DATE: July 22, 2021 JUL 2 7 2021 <br /> TO: Peter S. Hays DIVISION OF F.ECLAMATION <br /> MINING AND SAFETY <br /> FROM: Jamie Christensen <br /> RE: Green/Croissant Property Sand and Gravel Mine- File No. M-2001-022, Loveland Ready- <br /> Mix Concrete, Inc. <br /> Acreage Release Request Application (AR-4) <br /> I,Jamie Christensen, am objecting to any release of any part of mining Claim M-2001-022 for the <br /> following reasons. <br /> 1. The request is premature. The bridge design has changed several times since the county, <br /> without our permission sent LRM copies of a bridge design. There have been several instances <br /> of misrepresenting the facts and this is no exception. We have asked the county not to <br /> communicate with anyone that does not have legal authority to do so in regards to our <br /> property. We last had a county meeting on July 12th 2021 and are working on the details. The <br /> county has agreed to give us a 24 foot access for future commercial use. I received an email <br /> from Mike Bedell on July 201h, 2021 in regards to a new design that he stated they will try to <br /> have done, hopefully by the end of this month. There are several factors to address with the <br /> county requesting to move our access and do not know when it will be completed and how <br /> much it will actually affect the reclamation. We will update DRMS as soon we settle on an <br /> agreement. We have hired an Eminent Domain lawyer to handle and finalize all negotiations <br /> with the county on our behalf. <br /> 2. No release should be considered unless all issues that DRMS has been directed to fix are <br /> completed and inspected by DRMS. There are several issues with no date of completion issued <br /> so do we not know when to expect all the work to be done. <br /> 3. Water quality. The water samples done by Telesto, hired by LRM in June have conveniently <br /> been lost. That is what Telesto told us directly. (see pictures I previously submitted) <br /> 4. We are still waiting to see when and how LRM fixes the slope issues. <br /> 5. The pipe that LRM left in the river with a large hole has not been fixed or addressed <br /> 6. We are going to request to go before the board but have been advised to wait to see what items <br /> get fixed and what items would be left for the DRMS board to make a decisions on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.