My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-07-22_REVISION - M2010071 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2010071
>
2021-07-22_REVISION - M2010071 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2025 5:31:35 AM
Creation date
7/26/2021 6:20:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010071
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/22/2021
Doc Name
Request For Amendment To Permit
From
City of Lafayette
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM2
Email Name
AME
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cell 2A <br /> As specified in Exhibits E and F, Cell 2A will construct a compacted clay <br /> embankment around the perimeter of the reservoir. For the purpose of mitigating <br /> potential groundwater mounding up-gradient of the reservoir. The Cell 2A <br /> underdrain was designed as follows: <br /> Since the only historical onsite water table data in the vicinity of Cell 2A includes <br /> elevation data form piezometers P4 and P5, regional water table elevation <br /> contours published by the USGS Front Range Infrastructure Resources Project <br /> (FRIRP) Fact Sheet 113-98, were used to determine baseline upgradient and <br /> westerly water table information. This was done by developing a 3 dimensional <br /> surface of the USGS data, then lowering it by a uniform value to correspond with <br /> the Goose Haven site datum. The 3d surface water table surface from onsite <br /> data was then merged with the USGS data to yield an approximate overall water <br /> table contour map which is shown in Exhibit G Sheet 1. An analytical solution to <br /> groundwater flow based on Darcy's law was then used to determine the <br /> volumetric flow requirement of the drain. Given a conservative assumption that <br /> that groundwater mounding could saturate the full vertical extent of the soil profile <br /> above the historical water table, the calculation is as follows; <br /> Darcy's Law ; Q=(K*dh/dl)*A <br /> where; <br /> Q= volumetric flow <br /> K= saturated hydraulic conductivity = 28 ft/day (from NRCS web soil survey) <br /> dh/dl = hydraulic gradient = .02 (from Exhibit G — Sheet-1) <br /> A= Cross sectional area = 2300 ft x 4ft= 9,200 ft2 <br /> Therefore Q= 28 May x .02 x 9,200 ft' = 5,152 ft3 /day = 0.06 c.f.s. <br /> The underdrain alignment extends for 30+95.34 ft of which 2,300 ft are <br /> perforated pipe and <br /> Exhibit G, Attachment A gives the modeled flow capacity for 2300 ft of perforated <br /> section and 795.34 ft of solid pipe. Both sections are calculated to exceed the <br /> design flow of 0.06 c.f.s. <br /> The end of the underdrain alignment ties into an existing 8" pipe which daylights <br /> into the lower Boulder Ditch. This existing pipeline to Lower Boulder Ditch was <br /> historically used to drain the agricultural fields occupied now by Cell 2A. <br /> Underdrain Construction <br /> The underdrain was constructed by excavating a trench to the elevations shown <br /> in Exhibit G Cell 2A Underdrain Plan & Profile Sheets 2-7. For the first 2,300 <br /> ft, 6" SDR-22 PVC pipe was perforated with 2 tows of 3/8" holes spaced 1 ft <br /> apart. The pipe was backfilled with 6" of d50 = 1" rock surrounded with mirifi <br /> geotextile fabric surrounded by 6" of sand to create a filter pack. The remaining <br /> trench solid 795.34 ft section was bedded with 6" of sand. The entire trench was <br /> then backfilled with native silty sand (ML). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.