2021-07-19_REVISION - M1987026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Royal Gorge Field Office DOI-BLM-CO-F020-2020-0036 EA Brought Considered, Issue statement(question) but further Resource Program area element forward No Reason there is no issue or that (in alphabetic order) w/impact-causing for analysis issue further analysis is unnecessary specialist Date analysis deemed name unnecessary No phenomena that appear to be culturally sensitive were observed or Will the undertaking affect recorded by the archaeologists who Monica Tribal Concerns phenomena with traditional or X performed the cultural resources 1/5/21 religious significance to tribes? inventory. BLM is continuing to work Weimer with the tribes on the development of a streamlined consultation process. The proposed expansion area occurs in a mountain loam ecological site that is dominated by grasses.The proposed action would remove all vegetation from the site.Adjacent private land and existing developments cause How would the proposed mining fragmentation in the vegetative Vegetation expiation effect vegetation X community.This reduces the impact Sarah 7/22/2020 Colorado Rangeland Health that the removal of vegetation will McCleman Standard#3? have in the area.Impacts will not be significant with the implementation of Reclamation Design Features such as structure removal,regrading, recontouring,and revegetation of the site. Both visual quality and sensitivity to How would the new proposed change is high in the broader area of Black Obsidian Mineral the project due to the view shed. Visual Resources Materials Contract affect visual X However,the specific project area is L Skinner 7/16/2020 resources? within a section of land with both historic and current mining activity. There is a high level of disturbance 34