2021-07-19_REVISION - M1987026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Royal Gorge Field Office DOI-BLM-CO-F020-2020-0036 EA Brought Considered, Issue statement(question) but further Resource Program area w/impact-causing element forward analysis No Reason there is no issue or that specialist Date (in alphabetic order) for deemed issue further analysis is unnecessary name analysis unnecessary will monitor for,and if present, effectively treat Colorado list A and B noxious weeds,in accordance with BLM policy,State and county regulation. How would the proposed action Pre-existing authorizations for rights- Lands and Realty affect the lands and reality X of-way are in the vicinity of the project G.Valladares 07/15/2020 resources? area,but none within the location of the proposed action. The proposed mine expansion would utilize the existing mine's operational Would the proposed action protocol and levels of effort;therefore, cause excessive and offensive X no change in current noise levels Noise noise to the surrounding should result.Currently,noise A. Sanderson ]0/O1/2020 communities? generation is subject to the county requirements and is monitored through the Custer County Special Use Permit. Since the geologic material is igneous Would the proposed action in nature,there are no paleontological impact the paleontological resources(Class 1 category)present Paleontology resources within the mine X within the proposed project area; A. Sanderson 10/01/2020 boundary? therefore,this project will not have an adverse impact on these resources. The project area is part of the White Hills Allotment#05763.The project Will the proposed action affect area is a small portion of the allotment Sarah Range Management the current grazing in the area? X with the majority of grazing occurring McCleman 7/22/2020 north of this area.The expansion will minimally effect grazing. 32