My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
DRMS Comment Objection Intake 7/19/2021 3:05:25 PM
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021009
>
Comment Objection 44946 7/19/2021 (2)
>
DRMS Comment Objection Intake 7/19/2021 3:05:25 PM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2024 1:39:30 PM
Creation date
7/19/2021 3:11:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021009
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/19/2021
Doc Name
Comment/Objection
From
EDWARD DECICCO
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
AME
Media Type
D
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Alternate Phone Number <br /> Used only to follow up. <br /> Alternate Phone Extension <br /> Connection to Operation <br /> Select all that apply <br /> Land Owner of affected land Structure Owner within 200' of affected land <br /> Mineral Owner Nearby Resident <br /> Adjacent Land Owner Concerned Citizen <br /> Government Agency Other <br /> DESCRIPTION OF COMMENT OR OBJECTION <br /> (Please be as specific as possible) <br /> Comment/Objection Narrative <br /> As nearby property owners for the last 45 years,we have concerns with the proposed quarry project. <br /> A super fund effort has been in progress along the Clear Creek watershed for several years to mitigate the <br /> negative effects mining has and continues to have on the water shed. It does not seem logical or timely to add <br /> to this issue. <br /> Traffic on both the Central City Parkway and US 6 is our second concern.The CC Parkway was not necessarily <br /> designed with heavy truck traffic in mind.The impact on the road will be cause for unexpected maintenance. <br /> Central City is already struggling to meet their bond obligations.Can they really afford additional maintenance <br /> expense? <br /> The truck traffic on US 6 already has negatively affected from the current Frei quarry.The amount of trucks has <br /> not only impacted the roadway itself but also the atmosphere and environment of a canyon that is being <br /> fostered as Open Space. Millions of dollars are being spent to develop a walkway/bikeway that will end up <br /> being a noise and polluted air experience. <br /> Creation of additional ozone is also of concern.The quality of the air while crushing rock even with a water bath <br /> will add particulates to the air. Given the high elevation with less oxygen,a significant negative impact to air <br /> quality will result.This has been documented at the Fritz Peak Observatory. <br /> We feel these factors make the proposal an unacceptable concept. <br /> Permit Number* <br /> Enter valid letter and then numbers,for example M122112211 or C123456789. <br /> M2021009 <br /> Permitting Action Type <br /> Permit Type <br /> County <br /> Gilpin <br /> Site Name <br /> Perm ittee/Operator Name <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.