My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-06-17_PERMIT FILE - M2001046 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2001046
>
2021-06-17_PERMIT FILE - M2001046 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2025 2:58:56 AM
Creation date
6/21/2021 7:02:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001046
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/17/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ready Mixed Concrete Company, LLC
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Joe Lamanna <br /> June 9, 2021 <br /> Page 5 <br /> Peak strength is the maximum shear strength the claystone bedrock exhibits. The shear strength is made up of both <br /> cohesion (diagenetic bonding)and internal friction. Under short-term conditions for unsheared claystone, peak strength <br /> governs behavior. If a sheared surface or sheared zone is present within claystone as a result of faulting,slippage <br /> between beds due to folding, past shrink-swell behavior, stress relief,weathering,or from a landslide,the cohesion along <br /> the sheared surface is reduced to zero,and the angle of internal friction is decreased,due to alignment of clay minerals <br /> parallel to the shear plane. Under these conditions a claystone exhibits its lowest strength known as residual strength. <br /> Residual strength bedrock occurs in discrete zones, parallel with the sheared surface or zone,whereas fully softened <br /> strength occurs over a broader area(not used in this modeling). Based on data from other recent projects and <br /> engineering judgment,the residual strength claystone was modeled in a one-foot thick layer overlying the peak strength <br /> bedrock as follows: <br /> Dry Unit Moist Unit Saturated Unit <br /> Weight(pco Weight(pco Weight(pco Cohesion C'psf Friction Angle�' <br /> 116 Peak= 126 Peak= 135 Peak= 100 Peak=27 <br /> Residual= 110 Residual= 133 Residual=0 Residual = 15 <br /> Soil-Bentonite Slurry Wall <br /> The proposed slurry wall will consist of a mix of the overburden clayey to silty sand, alluvial sand, and imported <br /> bentonite. The resulting mix will produce a non-Newtonian fluid with some shear strength characteristics based on a <br /> reduced friction angle of the overlying overburden. Based on engineering judgment,we modeled the slurry wall as <br /> follows: <br /> Dry Unit Moist Unit Saturated Unit <br /> Weight(pco Weight(pco Weight(pco Cohesion C'psf Friction Angle�' <br /> NA 112 115 0 0 <br /> STABILITY ANALYSES RESULTS <br /> The stability analyses assumed the mining will be per the mine plan. Wet mining will occur in Cell 1 with a perimeter <br /> mine slope of 2.5:1. Dry mining will occur in cells 2 and 3 as the water level in these cells will be controlled by slung <br /> walls. The perimeter mine slopes of cells 2 and 3 will be no steeper than 2H:lV. <br /> Setbacks listed in Table 1 (below)indicate the setback from the structure to the mining limits. The setback distance can <br /> be increased as needed to address other restrictions such as weaker than anticipated soils,deeper mining, or <br /> unanticipated groundwater. <br /> The factor of safety shown below is the minimum factor of safety of the three conditions listed above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.