Laserfiche WebLink
12 May 2021 C-1981-044/Williams Fork Mines RAR <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> Y -Air Resource Protection R -Roads <br /> N -Availability of Records Y -Reclamation Success <br /> R -Backfill&Grading R -Revegetation <br /> N -Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste Y - Subsidence <br /> NA -Explosives Y - Slides and Other Damage <br /> Y -Fish&Wildlife N - Support Facilities On-site <br /> R -Hydrologic Balance N - Signs and Markers <br /> R -Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan N - Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> N -Other N - Special Categories Of Mining <br /> N -Processing Waste Y -Topsoil <br /> CONIMENTS <br /> This was an partial inspection of the Williams Fork Mine; C1981044,operated by Moffat County Mining <br /> LLC. The inspection was conducted aerially by Brock Bowles and the image analysis and report prepared <br /> by me,Robin Reilley of the DRMS. Skies appeared clear. Demolition of the site is complete. Backfilling <br /> and grading at the portal will resume in the next weeks of spring 2021. Main haul and access roads appeared <br /> in good repair,no offsite hydrologic or air quality issues were detected in the imagery. The vegetation at the <br /> site is beginning to green at this time of year. No active reclamation operations were occurring at the time of <br /> inspection. <br /> ONGOING PERMITTING ACTIONS: <br /> o Mid Term Review <br /> GENERAL MINE PLAN COMPLIANCE: <br /> Reclamation is,for the most part complete, and has been performed as permitted,with most facilities demolished. <br /> A number of ponds have permanent stock tank designation, and others will be reclaimed, as over the course of the <br /> year they do not retain water. With the exception of a vehicle storage building, any remaining facilities will be <br /> demolished and hauled away. <br /> ROADS-Rule 4.03 <br /> Construction 4.03.1(3)14.03.2(3);Drainage 4.03.1(4)14.03.2(4); Surfacing and Maintenance 4.03.1(5) and(6)I <br /> 4.03.2(5)and(6);Reclamation 4.03.1(7)14.03.2(7): <br /> o Main haul roads in and around the site appeared stable and adequately maintained. <br /> o No standing water or deep ruts were noted in the imagery. <br /> o Ditches along the roads appeared dry and functioning adequately. <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE-Rule 4.05 <br /> Drainage Control4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6;Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; <br /> Diversions 4.05.4;Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br /> Drainage-Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8;Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> o Ponds and ditches appeared dry and stable in the imagery. <br /> o Ponds and ditches appeared to be functioning adequately at the time of inspection. <br /> o Drainage ways appeared dry and to be functioning adequately at the time of inspection. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 8 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 4 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />